• LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s amazing how very far ahead siri was at the beginning, and how extremely far behind it became. It’s a massive miss for Tim Cook’s Apple

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Always has been.

      Did Siri be good at any moment though?

      I remember it sucked since its conception and in the most recent iOS versions too.

      • Artemis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It always sucked tbh, but I think what the OP meant is that when it came out, it was understandable that it was very limited and not good, yet still innovative and interesting. Apple just never really improved it beyond that.

        • kratoz29@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          This makes sense, now that I think about it, there used to be a tweak that mimics Siri for devices that didn’t support it, it was called Sara lol.

          And yeah Siri was better but still Sara shipped some interesting ideas like keyboard support, like any ideas that Apple took from old tweaks.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Given what we’ve seen of the current trend of generative AI chatbots, it’ll continue to be useless.

      • venusaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t agree. It can be leaps and bounds better. Won’t be amazing but if it’s essentially ChatGPT with a voice, it’ll be a huge upgrade.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Apple’s top software executives decided early last year that Siri, the company’s virtual assistant, needed a brain transplant.

    The product’s use of generative artificial intelligence, which can write poetry, create computer code and answer complex questions, made Siri look antiquated, said two people familiar with the company’s work, who didn’t have permission to speak publicly.

    technology threatens the company’s dominance of the global smartphone market because it has the potential to become the primary operating system, displacing the iPhone’s iOS software, said two people familiar with the thinking of Apple’s leadership, who didn’t have permission to speak publicly.

    That sense of urgency contributed to Apple’s decision to cancel its other big bet — a $10 billion project to develop a self-driving car — and reassign hundreds of engineers to work on A.I.

    Rather than compete directly with ChatGPT by releasing a chatbot that does things like write poetry, the three people familiar with its work said, Apple has focused on making Siri better at handling tasks that it already does, including setting timers, creating calendar appointments and adding items to a grocery list.

    The assistant’s struggles blunted the appeal of the company’s HomePod smart speaker because it couldn’t consistently perform simple tasks like fulfilling a song request.


    The original article contains 1,307 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 84%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!