• kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    So they’re ruining the original artistic vision, dumbing down literature despite existing whithin the greatest age of information, all while possibly ruining the original message and meanings of the book. Tech bros need to walk outside, touch grass, feel the warmth of the sun on their skin, and maybe try talking to an actual human for once in their life.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dunno - if A.I. is suggesting tech bros launch themselves into the sun, I could maybe get behind it.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m proud of my demon spawn

      She’s a tech savvy electrical engineer who spends her working hours mucking about with semiconductors.

      When she’s not at work, which seems to be pretty much all day every day, she’s out on remote hiking trails with primitive camping gear.

      From this old man’s perspective, she’s living the ideal balanced life.

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love that they picked a book that is 90% nuance and symbolism for a tool that destroys nuance and symbolism…it’s like claymation Shakespeare celebrity death match.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    "It was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair”.

    Becomes… “Things were confusing”

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is so important to take the artistic out of art. Especially right now when shitgasming AI is spaffing out content with no artistic value whatsoever!

  • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow it’s like they’re actively trying to make people dumber and not even hiding it anymore

      • shikitohno@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Something like this to produce graded readers is a great idea, but I don’t see anything in the ad itself that indicates it’s for language learners. If this is for a general audience for native speakers, then it’s enabling people to avoid learning to read (and ultimately use) more complex and nuanced language, in favor of infantilizing consumers and spoon feeding them everything.

        The only use case I could see this being a positive for when aimed at native speakers would be something like adult literacy programs, or maybe homeschooling for kids with difficulties learning to read who don’t have the trained, professional support that one would hope they might have in a more typical school setting. For adults who struggle with illiteracy, I could see this being quite beneficial, though. It’s something that people will often be embarrassed about to begin with, and somebody who’s feeling self-conscious about this could be demotivated by only being able to read books aimed at children. Even if they say “Screw it, I need to do this,” it can be difficult to maintain motivation and interest when the only content you can find at your reading level is written for little kids. If they could have adult materials adapted to a level that’s challenging but manageable for them, I could certainly see that being a good thing.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fuck it downvote me for having the wrong opinion but I am okay with this existing. Looking at the full feature list it has additional vocabulary learning tools and the reading level is scalable which might make this a hugely helpful tool for new or very young language learners.

    CliffsNotes already exists, yes, but summaries are different from paraphrasing, and it is very hit or miss with the accuracy of its summaries which usually have terrible grammar and writing quality anyway, making it awful for most English learners’ applications.

    Don’t like it? Don’t download it.

    • Sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t have a problem with simplified versions of texts – archaic language, ornamented prose, and obsolete cultural references shouldn’t stand in the way of someone having access to the ideas contained in great literature. But I like it when people do the simplifying–like “Reader’s Digest” versions, or Cliff’s Notes, or whatever. It’s a skilled profession that already doesn’t get the credit it deserves, and I worry AI will eclipse human work with voluminous inferior results.