• cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lol I love the “You don’t need root on modern Android, it does all the things you used to root for!” People. No, no it doesn’t lmao

      • doctortran@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That’s generally what you hear from people who have basic use cases and simply can’t fathom other people may want or need different things from their devices.

        Which is fine, they don’t have to understand. If stock is good enough for them nowadays, more power to them.

        What I’m sick of is the condescension. This bizarre thing where they somehow think a person wanting control over a device they paid for is worthy of derision or shame.

        It’s like if someone who only checks their email on their laptop laughing at someone using a desktop for heavier work, for no real reason other than thinking using technology differently than themselves is silly.

        That other comment is a perfect example, and indictive of this weird subculture in Android spaces that hates Google but seems to be drinking from the same user-hostile Kool aid.

        Personally, I’m an odd case, in that I didn’t used to root or use custom ROMs at all until recent years. Basically since Android 10, simply to get around the needless roadblocks and restore the functions I want. I was fine with stock for a long time, until Google started becoming Apple.

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    I would love to have this for my smart tv remote that has dedicated buttons for subscription services I will never pay for. /me heads to thingiverse to search

  • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ok, now I kind of want this. I only have my PC connected to the TV, so I only need the power button, volume controls, settings and the D-Pad. A specialized cover would make hitting the right buttons in the dark much easier and also remove the ads disguised as buttons.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I figured out my tv starts on the last used channel if it receives power after a power cut. All I need to control it is a smart plug

  • nicerdicer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Neat.

    The thing that bothers me whenever I see a TV remote is that there doesn’t seem to be a remote control with illuminated keys, like on a computer keyboard. That way you can see the buttons even under dim lit conditions. Also, why aren’t there any remotes with a built-in battery that could be charged like a smartphone?

    I don’t own a TV, but I know that back in the days of bulky CRT TV’s there were some remotes that could be iluminated. White LEDs weren’t a thing back then, so they used incandescent lamps which drained the 9V battery fast.

    Why aren’t back llit and rechargeable TV remotes a thing today, especially because white LED’s and batteries are quite efficient today?

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you want rechargeable batteries, just put some eneloop batteries (or some of the cheaper, rebranded ones) in the remote. They are not like the old NiMH batteries, they hold a charge for a years.

      I certainly don’t want a remote that I have to throw out in a few years because the non-replaceable lithium battery wore out.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      We have one like that with illuminated buttons, probably from around 2015, but it only stays on for 30 seconds or so

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    That… is a really shitty meme that misses the point?

    If you actually look at what the overlay exposes, the User still has the ability to pick specific channels, control volume, power, etc. All they really lose are the DVR (good example) and all of the user friendly stuff related to tv guides and the like (bad example).

    I assume this is just AI engagement farming bullshit that someone fell for and posted to lemmy but… I would actually say it would make more sense if the overlay were almost inverted.

    • Curiousfur@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      You also lose the ability to access the TV settings, leaving you stuck on the default settings, which is one of the reasons why most people root their phones.

    • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      One is for all, the other is just the TV. It’s probably a remote for a smart box or something, you can program some of the TVs commands on them, like on/off, input switching, etc… so you don’t have to juggle with 2 remotes in your hand.

    • rbn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      As sudo applies only for a single command, removing the cover is more like su, no?

      sudo would be more if above every covered button there was a tiny hole through which you could push it with a needle or so.