• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is that in a “this is what the future could be like” way, or a “grr, war on motorists, blame gay immigrants” way?

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not really, for now it is mostly “here’s the bike lane”, because the street is attributed to cars by default. So this quote is about reversing this mind set.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        So what I mean is that cars can only go in car-lanes - you’re not allowed to drive on sidewalks, bike lanes, bus lanes and so on.

        I may have misunderstood, though.

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          cake
          OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes, I think you’re not getting the point, it’s about making the default for bikes and pedestrians now, and treating cars as secondary users, that have their smaller delimited special lane.

          • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Could be something lost in translation, or I’m just usually dense today.

            Anyway, is this person saying this as a negative? Because I think it’s definitely a positive.

            • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
              cake
              OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              He’s supporting this change, he’s part of the local government developing it. So he’s saying that to illustrate the change of mindset.

                • Tobberone@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  As I get it, it’s about shifting the perspective from everything is for cars and pedestrians are an after thought to something like everything is for pedestrians except this particular piece of road where cars may drive. From “car first”, to “pedestrian first”.

  • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.vg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The article is paywalled, so good luck with it. Isn’t “Lemon de” on the conservative carbrain side?

    And, yes, speed limits need to be enforced somehow for all motorized vehicles within their contexts. Sidewalks are not for riding fast and bike paths aren’t for riding fast either. Speed limiters are most definitely needed, as is a lot of education. Civilization is 100% not ready for “sharable” scooters either.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yes, I said it is paywalled a couple of worlds before the link. I was just giving a source for the quote, it’s not really the point of the article.

      No, Le Monde (The World) is center left, which in France means close to Socialist party, which is close to Bernie Sanders in the USA. It’s probably the most well respected newspaper from France.