• db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Cheezus Crust. Just because of one removed comment you got so fucking mald. Get some perspective. YDI. Don’t make every post in PTB about drag and neopronouns.

    • FelixCress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Just because of one removed comment

      As long as his comment shouldn’t have been removed, your reply is utterly stupid.

      You could reply with “just because one innocent had to spend time in prison…”.

      Do you see how it works?

      No comment should be removed on stupid suspicion of trolling (which in practice means mods don’t like the views expressed by a user) and mods who do that shouldn’t be mods.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You could reply with “just because one innocent had to spend time in prison…”.

        Weak. You should have gone straight for the Hitler comparison.

        • FelixCress@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Weak. You should have gone straight for the Hitler comparison.

          Are you a little bit slow?

          You told the guy that it doesn’t matter if you were right or wrong removing his comment because it was just one comment. This is a ridiculous reply.

          If the comment shouldn’t have been removed, than it shouldn’t have been removed. If you admit you shouldn’t have removed it, than apologise to him rather than trying to ridicule his reaction.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That comment should absolutely be removed. I’m pointing out that even if they disagree with me, it’s just one goddamn comment

            • FelixCress@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              That comment should absolutely be removed

              Quote the rule under it should have been removed, I dare you. Just not ridiculous arbitrary “trolling” as so far I see your comments as trolling more than his - in this thread anyway.

              • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m not the kind of person who maintains a 300 page rules document for most to ignore and for a few dedicated others to dig for loopholes. Use your brain, common sense, and If you don’t like how the comm is run, feel free to open another. I don’t care.

                • FelixCress@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I’m not the kind of person who maintains a 300 page rules document

                  No, you are definitely a kind of person who makes them up when you go along. In this case you even didn’t bother to make it up I see, you just blatantly removed his comment because you didn’t like it. You should have never became a mod.

                  Do a decent thing and apologise to him.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      it’s not about drag and neopronouns, it’s about concern trolling…

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        And yet, that discussion immediately devolved into a drag & neopronouns argument. See how that works? Use other comparisons and less trolly phrasing.

        • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          i have zero control over what other people talk about, i certainly wasn’t goading them into….
          maybe, just maaaaybe, it’s relevant to mods banning real vegans for “not being a real vegan”.

          talking about concern trolling in a post about concern trolling isn’t “trolly” just because you personally don’t like it.

          just let people talk about what people want to talk about… it’s not going to hurt anything

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Unfortunately I have to look the big picture, and some topics, like drag, tend to dominate posts and unnecessarily heat up discussions in PTB into flamewars. You don’t have control, but I do have responsibility to curate this community to be positive and not have every goddamn topic discussing neopronouns. You got one (1) comment removed, ffs. Just use a different comparison.

            • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              3 months ago

              well you’re treating me as if i’m every other person that brought it up.
              sorry but not sorry, it’s a pretty glaring example of concern trolling.

              • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I literally just removed one (1) comment because it’s causing this drama yet again. Not everything is meant to a personal affront to you! You really need to get some perpective and chill the fuck out.

                I already explained the reasoning so I don’t think there’s anything left to say here.

                But if this thread starts the neopronouns discussion once more, I’m locking it like the rest.

          • Not Chad McTruth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            yeah we should be able to talk about that pronouns arent real and those who use them dont deserve respect it doesnt hurt anything

            edit you said you wouldnt engage me but then did it anyway

            also sorry db0 but tbf they started it

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    Try being more constructive. You begin to identify a genuine issue but you attribute it to some conspiracy that all the mods are trying to exclude leftists by making controversial rules. I think that is incorrect, they are trying their best even if their policy I wouldn’t fully agree with. It’s hard to get everyone to agree on anything, but leftists doubly so.

    So, what is the moderation style that you’d want to see in a Lemmy community? Could you find or create a community on an instance like lemm.ee that might fit that better?

    Just being salty about having your incendiary comment removed won’t accomplish much.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah sure. I think the removed commentor is being extremely pedantic in their reasoning to dismiss this person as “a nobody”. It’s very nuanced:

        They are correct but only in a technical sense: the part(ies) controlling the Parliament form the Government, 2nd place party (Conservatives) is the Official Opposition, the others are Recognized Parties within the legislature. However, the Liberals have been running a minority government with a plurality but not a majority of seats. And until September 2024, the NDP, which meant that Charlie Angus and the MPs in that caucus were helping keep the Liberal government intact in exchange for legislation that were in the NDP’s (more left wing) interests.

        In the international sense, Parliament is our legislative branch of a government, “Government” is the executive and our court system is the judicial branch.

        Let me get extremely pedantic here: is MP Angus part of the Government (aka the federal government) in official Canadian terms? No. To say MP Angus is part of the government (in an international sense, without using specific terms like federal government or Government of Canada) is perfectly acceptable, understood fine in Canada as much as elsewhere. You’ll notice the wiki page on it is very careful to differentiate the terms.

        Anyway, the thread linked is not the place to school people on these technicalities, and the user’s use of this to reach the conclusion suggesting MP Angus and the NDP are nobodies is false and misleading. The distinction or stretch of logic specifically is that “not part of the government” ≠ “a nobody in the legislature” when the user themselves were implicitly conflating the two in the beginning.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      some conspiracy that all the mods are trying to exclude leftists by making controversial rules.

      not “all the mods”, and clearly no point in continuing since you’re so willfully mischaracterizing what i plainly said.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    YDI let comments sections be about more than the same 3 fucken topics gyatt damb

  • Not Chad McTruth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    YCLB

    sounds like something a fake vegan troll would say

    edit

    YDI - You Deserved It
    CLM - Clueless mod
    PTB - Power-Tripping Bastard

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    YDI.

    Okay, there’s no rule explicitly saying “don’t bring up old and divisive discussions, that are likely to derail the new discussions into off-topic”… but come on that’s a given innit?