• deranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Seeming useless math can be applied if you look for opportunities.

    When I attended military training for sergeant rank, there was a land navigation part. Plot the grid coordinates on a map, use a protractor to figure out the angles, which you then aim the compass towards and count paces to find the points out in the woods. I realized these made triangles and said fuck a protractor. I used trigonometry instead. Figured out the lengths of the sides of the triangles from the grid coordinates, then used those lengths and tangent to figure out the compass angle and distance. The instructors had no clue what I was doing. Took first place in that course because the other person I was tied with only found 3 out of 4 points in his two tries at landnav.

    The best math skill for everyday life has to be dimensional analysis, though. Want to figure out how expensive it is to drive per hour? Well, you’ve got miles/hour, dollars/gallon, and miles/gallon. This can get you to dollars/hour by just canceling out the units. (I don’t have a paper to write things down but I think this is correct)

    dollars/gallon X gallons/mile X miles/hour = dollars/hour

    You can use dimensional analysis to convert all sorts of things. It’s awesome.

    Yeah I know it’s the shitpost community but math is pretty cool.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Tangentially related, you can also combine a basic knowledge of math with a basic knowledge of spreadsheets to make people think you’re the second coming of Einstein

      I shat this out in 5 minutes. All the white cells are user editable, and the blue cell calculates automatically. I could make it estimate annual gas costs by letting you adjust monthly mileage instead of speed and tweaking the math a bit. The average person would sooner close the application than try and make an interactive spreadsheet

      Edit: I made the annual price one. You can either use monthly mileage for a good estimate, or distance to work for a very rough estimate (it multiplies the distance by 2x260 (2 to account for round trip, 260 because there are 52 weeks in a year and every week has 5 work days))

      Of course it doesn’t account for non-work driving, but it also doesn’t account for holidays, so maybe it evens out

      For my turbonerds out there, I’m not sharing the sheet itself because my name is on it, but here’s the behind-the-scenes

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    “Another day has passed and I still haven’t used the notion that the height of something on a slope is equal to the horizontal distance from the start of the slope times the steepness of the slope plus the initial height of the slope off the ground.” I swear people treat math as something you explicitly need to sit down and write the equations for to get any use out of instead of just, like, them being useful to make you a more logical, well-rounded thinker. It’s like thinking the sole point of reading Of Mice and Men in 8th grade is so that you can randomly recite quotes from it years later.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      that’s how it’s taught. learning to reason about problems is secondary to “just do the numbers”. you’re not graded on understanding.

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      I don’t remember very much of “Of Mice and Men”, and I don’t remember very much of the math I learned in school either. I’m not mad about having learned/read that stuff, but I also don’t feel bad about not remembering/using it since.

      • Zwiebel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Learning it in your formative years likely improved your analytical thinking skills in general

        • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          I guess that’s the idea. I’m just saying it’s normal for most people not to need lifelong advanced math skills. It’s also normal for people to not like or be good at math. I really found geometry to be intuitive, but algebra was opaque.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    24 days ago

    I used the Pythagorean theorem and trigonometry to score an ~800 m headshot in Arma 3. It was a lot of grid spaces away. Pythagorean theorem to get the hypotenuse, then trig to get the vertical offset.

    Felt like a math sniper badass when I hit the shot the first time.

  • 5oap10116@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    I constantly use algebra/calc and graph data for my stem job. Everyone should have a similar base of knowledge. I don’t complain that I learned about the Mongolian empire or read Of Mice and Men.

    Unfortunately, the people thinking they don’t need to know stuff are also the people “doing their own research” on vaccines and such.

    Learning stuff doesn’t just impart knowledge, it rounds out your understanding of what you don’t know and where you should yield to expertice which is arguably equally as important as knowing stuff.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    24 days ago

    I used math to see if I could scale my 3d print model and see if it could fit in my print bed diagnolly instead of laid horizontally and vertically. My math was wrong, I thought I could do it but I missed some numbers.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      I use calipers and math to figure out how much filament is left on a spool.

      For example, think of the filament as one solid ring of plastic. My example spool is 60mm wide, the inner radius (of the filament, not the spool) is 28mm, and the outer radius is 40mm. Subtract the volume of the empty cylinder in the center from the solid cylinder of PLA, then multiply by 0.7 to account for packing density, and boom, you have a volume of filament that’s accurate to within a few percent. Convert that volume into cubic centimeters, multiply by 1.24, and you have a weight. This estimate gives my sample spool around 133 grams of filament.

      For a quicker, less accurate method, think of the filament as a collection of individual circles wound around the spool. My example spool is 60mm wide, so that’s around 34 strands of filament, and the filament is stacked 12mm deep, so that’s around 6 strands of filament (it’s safest to round down). 34x6=204, so the filament is wound around the spool 204 times.

      The average radius of one circle around the spool is probably 34mm (right in between the inner and outer diameters), so good ol 2πr gives us an average circumference of 213mm. 213mm×204 windings is around 43,500mm of filament, or 43 meters. Multiply by 3 grams (roughly the weight of 1 meter of filament). This estimate gives my sample spool around 129 grams of filament.

      It sounds very involved, but once you get the hang of it it’s very intuitive. You just have to know that

      • a circle’s circumference is 2π times the radius, or π times the diameter

      • filament weighs about 3 grams per meter of length

  • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I tried to use it to see if I could see fireworks from my house once. I spent an hour or two before I realized it was actually a trigonometry problem and just had to figure out the angles.

    The only other time was when I made a chart for a subreddit to show their average growth rate. I made them some art and a discord, and it was really cool to see the community flourish.

    I find myself using parabolas a lot more often.