• Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t get how suicide nets is a knock on china. They’re making our phones.

    It’s our consumer demand and our company’s price points that are responsible for the conditions in the factories that make our phones.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      because the Chinese public isn’t supposed to know about it… plus people might demand more ethically produced phones if they were more aware.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s their citizens / labor laws.

      Sure an American said “we want 12h shifts 6 days a week with absolutely minimal breaks” (or whatever the specifics are) (and that’s a a terrible request.)

      But the kicker is a Chinese labor official said “yup, sure thing”

    • araneae@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      China decided to play ball with the slave economy because it makes scads of money. If they were interested in pushing fucking state communism and raising the quality of living perhaps this was the wrong move. I suppose the counterargument would be that letting the west export its manufacturing sector somewhere else would have been a missed opportunity, but perhaps (and I say this as an American) the better move ideologically would have been not to engage with manufactory colonialism for a quick buck. Now we have Foxcon. They might have aligned with communist or at least sympathetic governments around the world for the project of I dunno stonewalling western oligarchs and not participating in the capitalist economic system. Insane, radical, anti-Party thought I know, I’m sorry. Just thinking out loud here.