Honestly an AI firm being salty that someone has potentially taken their work, “distilled” it and selling that on feels hilariously hypocritical.

Not like they’ve taken the writings, pictures, edits and videos of others, “distilled” them and created something new from it.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Not relevant. We are talking models not training data.

      The training data is free cuz it’s freely found on the internet.

      Not hard to understand.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      But but… AI isn’t just autocorrect!

      It searches the web for the most likely response to your queries, like a search engine.

      BUT IT’S NOT JUST A SEARCH ENGINE WITH AUTO CORRECT!! WAIT!!

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Typical of the type, it isn’t a big deal until it’s happening to them.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Post is pretending this isn’t apples to oranges.

      Openai never stole anything just looked at it.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s literally every conservative. They cannot c comprehend hardship unless they suffer it personally.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think they comprehend it then either tbh, like the 8 second memory a housefly has.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Suddenly feels like shit when they do it to you, right? Im not even that impacted by ai but seems like as long as people arent affected directly by something they have zero compassion. Basically leopards ate my face is that but its so fucking anoying. But the people voting for the leopards is just one thing, the leopards are still worse in my opinion. Using a little wordplay, i wish i could hunt leopards, i dont care what counts as democratic as THEY are the ones who are a direct threath against democracy. The whole right is. The assumption that someone has more rights as someone else is undemocratic to the core. People shouldnt have a right to vote over others rights. Thats how you solve the paradox of democracy. Elections should be boring, about the economy and how you manage resources, not about who can vote.

    Sorry for the rant(and offtopic), had a long day.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    ask general electric what china did with their engineering designs for nuclear power plants

    a) to expect China not to steal every piece of design they can lay their hands on is foolish and should be part of every tech companies contingency planning, and investor consideration

    b) given that deepseek seems to have condensed the processing, i can only imagine openai can now use their processes to make the high end chips work just that much more efficiently

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      ask general electric what china did with their engineering designs for nuclear power plants

      GE: “We have a design for a nuclear power plant that we’d like to build.”

      Chinese Construction Firm: “Great, we’ll pay you to help implement a prototype and then we’ll use the schema to build more plants”

      GE: “No!! That’s stealing!”

      Chinese Government: Begins building hundreds of new nuclear power plants

      American Government: Won’t build any new plants

      GE: “China made us lose money!”