cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/25627002

By Yasmine El-Sabawi in Washington
Published date: 5 February 2025 02:09 GMT

"On Tuesday, at a stunning joint press conference alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump announced the US will be taking over and running Gaza, potentially for the foreseeable future.

“Everybody I’ve spoken to loves the idea of the United States owning that piece of land, developing and creating thousands of jobs with something that will be magnificent,” Trump told reporters after a three-hour meeting with Netanyahu. "

  • duckCityComplex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    A man like Trump only gets more unhinged as tie goes by and his increasingly insane behavior goes unchecked. We utterly failed to stop him in the US. Having completely conquered America he is now setting his sights on the World. If he knew history I wouldn’t be surprised to hear him comparing himself to Alexander the Great.

    His past aversion to military adventures in the Middle East was literally the only thing I appreciated about him, but now that’s gone by the wayside.

    Buckle up, world… Don’t underestimate him.

  • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Where are all of the people that were complaining about Kamala and saying they didn’t vote or voted for trump because of gaza believing trump was going to be the better solution?

    • Peter Link@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Many opposed Harris because she continued very active support to the Israeli genocide. Very few believed Trump would be better.

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      The vanity of not choosing a lesser evil.

      All the clutched straws of misapplied “false dichotomy”, “showing the democrats that they must change”, etc are just intellectual dishonesty. It’s actively and knowingly choosing a greater evil by not flipping the lever in a real life trolley problem.

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Some people don’t seem to understand, even in a situation where there are two evils, choosing the lesser evil is always beneficial. Politics is not just something you can boycott and cover your eyes from. It governs your life, so you have all to gain from participating in it and educating yourself about it, no matter which side you ultimately lie upon.

        • Deestan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Exactly.

          It was an opportunity to pick who would be in power for them to fight for improvement.

          If they effectively meant what they claim, they’d push with heart and soul to get the lesser evil in poer and then immediately fight them tooth and nail for positive change.

          “We need to fight for change. I prefer my opponent to devolve into oppressive fascism first, please.”

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            Oh but if kamala wanted to change her ways they’d have done it before or during the election /s

            It’s not like they’d have been scared of being labelled an anti semite, like what happened to corbyn when he started critiquing israel 10 years ago.

  • JOMusic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    In Australia, we even just had Pauline Hanson say this is a bad idea.

    For context, she is a white Australian politician who once wore a burqa into parliament to make a point. Even she is against Trump on this one.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    The effect will be stability, but not in a good way. Like a pile of bricks being more stable than a wall because they can’t fall over.

    US troops pacify enough that no government can grow there, and no foreign nations (Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, etc) can sponsor a puppet government.

    Things that will be cracked down on: Any strong organization not endorsed and in leash of US military.

    Things that will not be: Systemic problems like corruption, smuggling, organized crime, etc. And with no other organizing force allowed, nobody will be in power to handle those.

    The result will be less violence and war, but a region that’s not sustainable or functioning. It’ll be less able to stand on its own after the US gets bored with it than it is now.