It’s brief, around 25:15

https://youtube.com/watch?v=nf7XHR3EVHo


If you’ve been sitting on making a post about your favorite instance, this could be a good opportunity to do so.

Going by our registration applications, a lot of people are learning about the fediverse for the first time and they’re excited about the idea. I’ve really enjoyed reading through them :)

  • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    207
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    I wish he had mentioned Lemmy, but it’s understandable that he didn’t. Also Bluesky isn’t an alternative to big tech, it IS big tech. I wish it wasn’t stealing so much of our publicity lately.

    But beggars can’t be choosers, and we have seen some nice growth over the past couple months. John Oliver fans are the perfect candidates to join the fediverse, hopefully some of them find their way to Lemmy.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’m really not happy about bluesky their fragmentation of the fediverse protocols

        shrug, I wish they were with us, but they are also a big ole corporate entity, so I’m kind ok with us staying our our side of the fence. As they need to implement payment and corporate protections to their network, we’re free to be free over here.

        is only going to harm us in the long run.

        We don’t have to play ball. not with them anyway,

        I think, If we have any credible threat, it’s going to be from the Governmental gross anti-tampering laws, forced moderation, or backup regulations. They could make it legally difficulty for us to exist.

        • kudra@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          I think, If we have any credible threat, it’s going to be from the Governmental gross anti-tampering laws, forced moderation, or backup regulations. They could make it legally difficulty for us to exist

          This. I have considerable concern that Fascists will straight up ban Fedi if enough people shift to it. They don’t like not being able to control everything, Fedi is far too much actual freedom of communication.

            • kudra@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              They’d shut down large instances, pressure WordPress to remove support, in the US at least, it could be seen as too risky, if they wanted to they would find a way. I don’t think this would happen easily in the EU though.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              You make laws like the Online Safety Act in the UK. You then attach a multi-million dollar fine to anyone who doesn’t adhere to the bonkers unenforceable stipulations in the text.

              All of a sudden, no one but a corporation with a legal department can safely run an instance without putting their money and eventually freedom on the line.

              They might not be able to just stop it, but you can force us into a pirate scenario where we have to do it in the dark.

              We are likely starting to slowly head into 1984 territory. IF Fascim continues to rise, eventually, non-state-run media will be deemed unlawful and they’ll do what they can to make it go away.

      • Dil@is.hardlywork.ing
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Bluesky was always twitters goal, they were losing hella money, so they devloped blue sky.

    • tomenzgg@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Also Bluesky isn’t an alternative to big tech, it IS big tech. I wish it wasn’t stealing so much of our publicity lately.

      This; I’m so sick of hearing it pop up when people mention alternatives.

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        The thing that it really has going for itself is that it simply isn’t twitter. And Muskler made sure that’s a huge deal.

    • anachronology@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Agreed, but at least Bluesky is a public benefit corporation, so it supposed to take in the needs of society as well as profit in its decision-making. That may not be much, but it’s a start.

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I’m not familiar with the details of that, but it seems like more of a red herring to me. A form of controlled opposition to divert people away from truly revolutionary platforms.

        Of course it has to seem like a plausible alternative, but is it actually decentralized or altruistic enough to make a meaningful difference? I think not.

        • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          14 days ago

          “Public benefit corporation” is such an oxymoron, I know it’s cliché to say this but it reads like something out of 1984.

          If your goal is truly to benefit the public, why wouldn’t you start a non-profit? It’s because they want profits, which will always be at odds with the interests of the public.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            If your goal is truly to benefit the public, why wouldn’t you start a non-profit?

            Because your non-profit isn’t likely to go anywhere; Capitalists don’t give significant money to non-profits, but they’ll invest in a public benefit corporation because of the potential for profit. The corporation can then take their money and use it for whatever public benefit it intends to work towards. It’s a workaround to try and scrape some benefit to society out of capital, that otherwise wouldn’t exist.

            Whether Bluesky is actually a good example of a public benefit corporation or not, I have no idea, I don’t use it.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 days ago

          You’re absolutely right, but as a UxD, until these platforms learn UxD, they’ll never work. They can’t.

          It doesn’t matter how great they are, the vast majority of people won’t learn. And they shouldn’t have to. That’s why big commercial apps are better – good designers need to eat, and big companies can pay for their eggs.

          It doesn’t matter how good your model is, without great UxD, you’re dead in the water.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        13 days ago

        “Public benefit corporation” is a meaningless designation. All it means is they have the option of putting their mission over their shareholders, not that they are obligated to do so.

      • Dil@is.hardlywork.ing
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        If I was losing money and wanted to mantain control over the public id become a public benefit corp too

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      John Oliver fans are the perfect candidates to join the fediverse, hopefully some of them find their way to Lemmy.

      Too late - we are already here!:-P

      img

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          13 days ago

          I think he plays the awkward card to actual cringe levels at times but I’ll also watch Cody’s Showdy so that can’t be it entirely.

          Can’t say I love him, but I do appreciate the work he does.

          • Twista713@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            13 days ago

            Haha, yeah Cody has definitely made me cringe out of discomfort before. I haven’t watched that guy in awhile! Appreciate the reminder. And Oliver can get close to that level too, for sure.

    • Otter@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      13 days ago

      Indirectly, looking up “John Oliver Mastodon” brings up this post in the top few. “John Oliver Pixelfed” has this post as the first option

      So we’re not completely left out :)

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Exactly, don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Someone using BlueSky over Twitter is a good thing.

    • Novice_Idiot@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      John Oliver being uploaded to YouTube is awesome! I should comment that Lemmy is a great Reddit alternative