I thought this was slightly funny.

Mark Zuckerberg is known these days for wearing t-shirts with Latin phrases on them, especially ones where he compares himself to Julius Caesar.

Bluesky made a shirt in the same style, but theirs says “a world without Caesars” in Latin.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I mean why is this surprising? Custom domains are a very niche thing; the majority of people don’t know or don’t care.

  • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s cool but I’ll check back in to see which fascist technocrat is running bluesky in 8 years

  • gcheliotis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Zuckerberg wears t-shirts comparing himself to Julius Caesar? Why is that every time I think I’m up-to-date on the latest weirdness there’s more of it?

    • StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      He’s not doing those roman salutes in public yet, though.

      But it’s kinda funny that the oligarchs are so obsessed with Rome, famous for baking a fallen empire, while enabling the fall of the US.

    • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Roman empire, like the nordic pagan BS is also a (extreme) right-wing fetish.
      So glad to see our new PM celebrating his election win like this:

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lol his face… It’s like he knows this is a bad idea and he has no idea how he ended up there.

        That or he’s just an idiot and his face always looks like that.

        • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Poor thing is his son, molded by daddy.
          You should see the video, he just looks scary in it. The empty look, no thoughts, just following orders.
          His sister already had mental problems at a young age and got help, this one doesn’t know it yet.

        • Bloomcole@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Belgium.
          As I said, after winning the national election.
          While we have an even more extreme party (VB)he is the leader of the NVA, basically a nationalist separatist party that wants to split the country and indepence for the Flemish speaking part.
          Historically they were the party that collaborated with the nazis.
          While they are careful to not be associated with extremism sometimes their true nature shows.

        • Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Reverse image search brings up articles for belgium referencing a nationalist party, apparently younger dude is his son?

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Here you go:

      At Meta’s annual Connect event in Menlo Park, Calif., Zuckerberg wore a custom T-shirt with the Latin phrase “aut Zuck aut nihil,” or “all Zuck or all nothing,” as he revealed the first working prototype of Meta’s augmented-reality glasses.

      The phrase was a play on “aut Caesar aut nihil,” which means “either a Caesar or nothing,” or more simply “all or nothing.”

      Zuckerberg has long been interested in the Roman Empire. He spent his honeymoon in Rome and two of his children, August and Aurelia, are named after emperors Augustus and Marcus Aurelius.

      Incidentally, fascists tend to have a hard-on for ancient Rome, but I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.

      • gcheliotis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Zuck puts out this weird “pick me” or “me too” energy lately, trying to fashion himself as one compatible with Trump’s world. His interest in Rome may precede Trump’s ascension to power, but his coming out is not a coincidence in my view. And yes, a fascination with Rome started as so many other things as an “innocent” meme and became a fascist dog-whistle.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I think fascists idolizing the Roman Empire goes back as far as Mussolini. The fasces, after which fascism is named, was a Roman symbol.

  • cocolowlander@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m going to state an unpopular opinion. Bluesky should have ads, not a personalized ads that track users, but just simple ones at the very top of the feed. Consumers today are too addicted to free services, and companies need to be financially independent so that they can support a quality product.

    • XNX@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ads incentivize them to make the platform addicting and to prioritize ragebait because it will cause people to stay engaged in the app longer.

    • JealousJail@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Agreed. Being financially independent can also foster ad investments and lead to a popularity gain

      • Yoga@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Ads are attractive to many users because they have a simple option for universal opt out (adblocking) at the cost of everyone who isn’t a Freerider.

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Another reason why they just externalize the cost of the website onto anyone who can’t use an ad blocker or doesn’t know how.

        • Traister101@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes but a lot of us who do block ads block them largely because they are intolerable. I largly only started blocking ads at all because of how utterly miserable YouTube ads became.

          • Yoga@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Gotta love loading a mobile webpage and 20% of it is readable text and the rest is advertising.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        If you mean somebody, somewhere is footing the bill, then sure, if you torture the definition of “free” enough, then nothing on Earth is free. It is worth pointing out that if you enjoy (for example) Wikipedia, then you should donate if you can, because Wikipedia runs on donations. If you’re just trying to be a pedantic jackass, though, that’s another thing.

  • LithiumX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s funny because if you read history you know that Caesar took down the republic on a wave of populism.

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Their custom domain business can’t be big, I am assuming they merely get some referral commission from sending business to a registrar, that can’t be a lot of money.

    Or am I missing something?

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      True, but they also just don’t fucking advertise it at all, and its on a forgotten subdomain only linked to in a blogpost, and the date on the page still says 2023 at the bottom.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      As much as I hate to be that guy, it’s worth keeping in mind that BlueSky is not really practising what they preach here. The AT protocol formally allows for a kind of decentralization, but it is prohibitively expensive to run an instance, meaning that only rich folks or those who are willing to accept money from venture capitalists will be capable of actually doing so.

      ActivityPub already existed when they started BlueSky. They chose to not make their protocol compatible. The reason is simple: They are a company, and they have a profit motive. ActivityPub is too democratic, and therefore hard to monetize. By now they have a bunch of crypto bro investors who want their money back. It’s better to leave your money elsewhere.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t mind people setting up for-profit businesses. After all it’s what you’re supposed to do in a capitalist society, but the issue with it is when company start putting profit before people. As long as they don’t do that I’m not bothered that they make business-minded decisions.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          The real problem begins when one has to consider how to make money from a social media platform. Selling T-shirts with sick burns written in Latin is not going to work forever.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Right… isn’t the obvious response to this “holy shit, they really don’t have a business model even remotely figured out here???” which immediately leads you to the realization that everything they promise (no matter how genuine the employee making the promises is) is subject to being sacrificed at the alter of “sorry we had to monetize and make difficult decisions”.

            This isn’t difficult, it is just exhausting.

            What this says is that Bluesky has no idea how to make a profit off of social media ethically and they would be better off spending their time selling smart political and funny t-shirts than distracting people with a false vision of the future that is going to end up just making everybody even more cynical in the end when it inveitably enshittifies the same exact way every other for-profit social media venture has…

            Nah I am good, I will put my energy into helping the fediverse grow because I know how this story goes and I can’t stand the rising headache I get from seeing it repeat endlessly. I want a different future and so I am here.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        ActivityPub already existed when they started BlueSky. They chose to not make their protocol compatible.

        Traditionally, that’s what new major version numbers are for. IF (and I stress the “if” because I have no clue about protocol design) it turns out that AT has useful features, a merger of ideas of both ActivityPub and AT could lead to ActivityPub 2.0.

        That would be somewhat similar to AMD’s proprietary Mantle leading to Vulkan (which was originally intended to launch as OpenGL 5.0).

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        only rich folks or those who are willing to accept money from venture capitalists

        Or non-profits that are willing to accept money from supporters.

        ActivityPub already existed when they started BlueSky. They chose to not make their protocol compatible.

        Because AT protocol has features that are incompatible with ActivityPub, and those features are important to some users.

        • Mora@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Which benefits does AT have in comparison to Activity pub? Except currently single point of entry/failure?

          • cabbage@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago
            • The real user names (DIDs) are cryptic codes that are kept hidden most of the time, with your visible user name redirecting towards it. This gives the illusion that user names can be changed/transported, and that users are not locked down to one platform.
            • Content is filtered rather than censored, so that a big monopolistic actor can allow bigots on their platform but keep them out of sight of regular users. Had Bluesky been an ActivityPub hub, it could easily end up being perceived as a nazi bar. This is a benefit for Bluesky who do not want to be responsible for moderating their platform.

            They want decentralized moderation on a centralized platform. That’s how on Bluesky, there’s an understanding that the removal of hate speech “conflicts with Bluesky’s decentralized goals”. On Mastodon, the decentralized nature is how we can give bigots the boots without them getting to whine about their freedom of expression. Bluesky manages to create a problem using the very same concept by which Mastodon solves it.

            I guess this didn’t really end up being a post about the benefits of AT. Oops.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              This is a benefit for Bluesky who do not want to be responsible for moderating their platform.

              At least in Germany there is a mandatory German filter list that seems to be maintained by Bluesky themselves. They couldn’t legally operate here if they allowed holocaust denial and such.

              • cabbage@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                There are minimum standards they’ll have to abide by, but that’s similar to Meta after their change of policy. It really is not enough that it should make anyone feel comfortable.

                Basically big platforms can choose between making moderation expensive, minimal, or arbitrary. Bluesky is leaning into minimal, keeping the door open for most things as long as they’re legal. Reddit is leaning into arbitrary, having AI banning folks on account of upvotes. Facebook used to dabble with expensive, but have made a recent shift into minimal.

                • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Bluesky is leaning into minimal, keeping the door open for most things as long as they’re legal.

                  This simply will not work, some other option, probably rushed, poorly thought through and ultimately more authoritarian than an honestly constructed moderation structure would have been will be implemented when this approach ultimately fails catastrophically.

                  I pre-emptively post a surprised pikachu here to signify this

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Or non-profits that are willing to accept money from supporters.

          The fact that we don’t see this yet, and that Bluesky has accepted the amount of money they have from actors I would not want to be associated with, makes me doubt this is possible.

          Even if a non-profit wanted to operate with good intentions, the expense of running an AT proto hub would eventually prove a challenge, and the non-profit would either go under or need to start looking around for money. Meanwhile people can self-host their Mastodon instance on a Raspberry Pi.

          Regarding the alleged missing features of ActivityPub, I have tried and failed to understand exactly which feature is the AT proto so desperately want that they found it impossible to achieve through ActivityPub. The whole thing with having a mobile identity or whatever seems like a nothing burger to me - at the end of the day it just means that your user name is your DID number, and that web addresses can redirect towards that one. It’s hardly some technological marvel that could never have been achieved on a less centralized protocol.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Regarding the alleged missing features of ActivityPub

            There are significant differences in account portability. ActivityPub allows you to transfer your followers to a new server, but not your content.

            • cabbage@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Nothing in ActivityPub says you can’t move your content from one platform to another. It’s just that Mastodon does not have this feature at the moment.

              Meanwhile, I’m not sure whether Bluesky has this feature or not, but it’s somewhat irrelevant considering the fact that there are no other platforms to move your content to. The only thing I’ve actually seen from this is that you can use an URL as your username in the front-end, though it just points towards the same DID in the backend. I struggle to see what the great achievement here is.

              If this was the reasoning behind Bluesky, they could have developed a platform running on AP supporting the transfer of content between instances, and it would have been a whole lot easier than developing a whole new protocol.

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Nothing in ActivityPub says you can’t move your content from one platform to another.

                Your content in ActivityPub is linked to the home instance. So for example I can’t move this post from lemmy.world to another server. I could copy/paste the content into a new post on another server, but it would be a broken piece of our conversation with no context or replies.

                Also, hosting a ATProto self-instance is not as expensive as you suggest. This person did it for $150/month.

                • cabbage@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Fair - you could host a copy or a link (or a sort of combination between the two, I guess), but it wouldn’t transfer the ownership of the original post. I’m still not sure this is such a pressing feature that I accept it as the actual raison d’etre of AT proto, especially considering how it very much exists there only in theory at best. But it is interesting technology, and something they could maybe have worked with ActivityPub to try to achieve.

                  I’m glad to hear that maybe Bluesky is more decentralized than I suspect, but Bluesky engineer whose blog post you linked still links to his bluesky account on bsky.social. If running a separate instance is achievable, I would love to see people actually do it.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Well, most people don’t read Latin, so there’s a high risk of ending up looking exactly as pretentious as the asshole one seeks to make fun of. That said, taste is individual, each for their own.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            That’s a fair point. If you’re concerned about people judging you, you probably wouldn’t want to be seen as a Fuckerburg fanboy.