FriendOfDeSoto
Joined the Mayqueeze.
- 0 Posts
- 191 Comments
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Due to the bystander effect its highly unlikely any stranger would help you if you got attacked in a public spaceEnglish31·16 hours agoNo, I don’t know which one. And I don’t want to watch people get hurt so I won’t seek it out either. There are incidents in this world that fit the theory of the bystander effect. That is not what I question. I’m questioning your calculation of odds regarding intervention. There are enough examples of “heroes without capes” that did intervene as well, also within groups of people.
A shower thought doesn’t have to be well thought through. On the flip side, you don’t have to double down on it when folks point out the flaws.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Due to the bystander effect its highly unlikely any stranger would help you if you got attacked in a public spaceEnglish14·18 hours agoThe bystander effect is a theory, not fact. It can explain after the fact why people in groups feel less responsibility to do something. But it isn’t universally applicable to all assaults in public. There are many variables at play. So “highly unlikely” is an exaggeration in my view.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•What is the origin of the whole "X destroys and humilates Y" genre of debate videos?English3·1 day agoSo what did the dog find? What? WHAT DID THE DOG FIND? TELL. ME. I HAVE TO KNOW!
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•What is the origin of the whole "X destroys and humilates Y" genre of debate videos?English10·1 day agoThat’s just YouTube speak. The implied drama gets them more clicks. It’s how to frame the ancient medium of public debate for millenials and genz. It’s like YouTubers pulling the dumbest, silliest possible face on the thumbnail. It’ll have more views too.
It’s also a sign of the times since Y2K that you couldn’t just have an enlightening discussion. Somebody has to get owned. Hitchens was forthright in his rhetoric but I never heard him be disrespectful. I’ve only ever seen him tracking the ball, not the players. But that’s boring so people add their own spice to it. And they tend to cut out any counter arguments if the footage was from a public debate.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is this still on the ace spectrum or what?English3·2 days agoYou should add your age for context. You’re either a normal adolescent/young adult figuring shit out like all of us have to. Or you can consider yourself part of the spectrum, maybe in aceflux. You can do that at any age to be fair. I would just wait until maybe ~25 before you make your own identity ruling here. And keep in mind stuff changes over time still even after you’ve reached that age, maybe just at a slower pace.
In the end, you do you. I would recommend honesty with your partners. They could be pretty pissed when they find out by accident that you’ve been more like holding your proverbial nose to enable intercourse.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is there or has there ever been information illegal to possess or have?English17·2 days agoHaving info on the heliocentric solar system could land you in a dungeon or worse back in the day.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Do you think conservatives feel the same need to burn it all down when charlie kirk died as everyone else felt when trump won again?English11·3 days agoThis is too simplistic. I know conservative voters who didn’t vote for 47, many not even for 45. Conservative is a value set and the Venn diagram of that with MAGA is far from a perfect overlap. If you replace “conservatives” with “47’s cult-like followers” I would come closer to agreeing with your take. I do take issue with “everyone else” though. I think that doesn’t hit the mark either. I think there is more purple between this red team/blue team thinking than there are both extremes of this scale added together. Stop digging deeper trenches. And don’t shoot your political opponents.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto Fuck AI@lemmy.world•AI Murder Cult Hearing Devolves Into Courtroom ChaosEnglish1·3 days agoI feel like so-called AI was the least impactful variable in this clusterfuck.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•The wife of Florida's surgeon general claims her husband won’t work with anyone she hasn’t vetted. A leading vaccine skeptic, she believes “dark forces” are targeting her family with chemtrailsEnglish418·4 days agoGuys, I’m like her. I learned to trust my gut and stand on my own two feet. And I think they are mad and most of what they say ought to be ignored.
The inch I would give them is that governments all over this planet have probably overreacted during the pandy. Which is easy to bitch about in hindsight but becomes often very easily comprehensible when you look at how decisions had to be made quickly, under pressure, never with all the information at hand, and being driven by erring on the side of caution. They may have been the stopped clock that was right twice a day on some of those pandemic restrictions. That doesn’t mean they are right about everything else. And we might need the magic castle to become the ground zero for a massive outbreak of easily avoidable diseases for more people to realize that. Aided by chem trails, I guess. JFC.
The voices I hear tell me to look forward to hearing about the skeletons in the Ladapo closet. He might have an extramarital affair; she might be sniffing glue. Or they imprison their cleaner. A tax dodge at the very least. It’s going to be something even the angels couldn’t warn her about.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Not trying to disparage first responders on 911. Why aren't nurses included with fire and police departments? Did we not take care of people on the backend of the rescuing?English1·6 days agoLol I read that as “first responders or 911” as in nine one one. I would say the addition of a / might have clarified it. But that doesn’t diminish my failure at reading comprehension.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Not trying to disparage first responders on 911. Why aren't nurses included with fire and police departments? Did we not take care of people on the backend of the rescuing?English3·6 days agoI’m fairly confident that you are generalizing this a bit and that there are police and fire fighting departments on this planet that employ nurses. In general though, first responders who get injured end up in the same system than the people they save and need medical attention: hospitals. If you are in need of nurse aftercare, you are probably off on sick leave - so what would the nurse actually do? Especially in the smaller bf-nowhere operations, I don’t see how you could justify the cost. Plus, most firehouses have paramedics already. They’re not the same as a nurse but bring a lot of similar skills.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Did I used to be homophobic? Am I?English37·9 days agoIf we are honest with ourselves, we all have biases that end in -phobia. They are on a siding scale and get more pronounced in certain situations. The assholes in society don’t gaf about their biases and don’t care if they say or do hurtful things as a result. The more enlightened people know about their lizard brain biases and try their best not to act on them.
Maybe you are a bit homophobic. But you are aware of your biases and you can make sure you don’t act on them in a way that is hurtful to other people. Knowing is half the battle. So don’t beat yourself up over it. From what I’ve been reading in your post you are doing it right.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto Fuck AI@lemmy.world•AI Chatbots Are Having Conversations With Minors That Would Land a Human on the Sex Offender RegistryEnglish574·11 days ago(We are) committed to continually improving safeguards against harmful or inappropriate uses of the platform.
Effing funny. Turn it off then. It’s not unintended use of the platform. It’s at this point in time an uncontrollable operation.
Meanwhile, experts behind the latest investigation are appalled at Character’s inability to ward off harmful content for underage users.
I must point out here that the first bulwark of corrective action is the purview of parents/guardians. You can blame these effing companies for having minor-grooming chat bots, which they should not have. Not even in a testing phase. But we cannot just work this one angle. We cannot let parents et al off the hook. You have to have a least three talks now with the kids. Birds and bees, social media and online bullying/predators, and so-called AI. As bad as I feel for the parents of teenagers who took their own life: it wasn’t just the chat bot, was it.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•do you apologize, even if it's not your fault just to make the other person feel validated?English2·14 days agoThere is no simple answer to this. It’s like at least three factors interacting. How much empathy do you feel towards the other person? How close is your relationship on the scale of strangers bumping into each other on the street to best friends forever? How big an issue has any of this been objectively (or as close as you can get there)? So that’s three sliding scales to adjust to get an outcome. The closer a relationship is, the harder this can be because there is history and people (I’m including myself in this) can be very petty.
Just judging by the hints you dropped you should probably reconsider your approach to your coworkers. And I don’t mean you need to be submissively apologetic all the time and share everything from your private life, even your hemorrhoid problems, with the crew. You’ll probably make your life easier just on a human level plus improve odds of promotion if you do more of that, even if it feels more line cosplay to you. I share your “grow the eff up”/no bullshit stance but that only works in a group of like minded people.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•*Permanently Deleted*English4·14 days agoI think it’s the wrong label, anti-intellectualusm. Sense of reality might do it more justice. I think there are two factors at play. 1) how much does higher education cost you? Does it put you in debt you’ll be lucky to have paid off before you retire? Have other people gotten degrees and still ended up unemployed? Why get majorly in debt to get no job in the end? That’s more a North American specific problem. I’m in Asia and I haven’t heard anybody shit talking college degrees in favor of the trades. 2) We need plumbers and carpenters and welders and whatnot. And due to declining birth rates in many places and the fact that the numerous birth years of the boomers are retiring and will continue to retire in the short term, we are running out of sparkies, masons, and HVACs. So if you had to career advise people today, you’d be silly not to bring up a profession with near certainty of getting a job once you’re trained up.
Shitty work environments exist in more high brow professions as well.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto Fuck AI@lemmy.world•Legit studies regarding the negatives of AI in business?English9·15 days agoI think your sister is stuck in an unenviable position. This shit is new. All good studies that I would label reliable information are surely yet to come. The lab coats are just getting ready to dig in. And everything that’s out there on the internet today is piecemeal or corporate PR.
FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.websiteto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Would you ever give up your right to leave a bad review about a company?English1·18 days agoPeople are mad. There are mad people on both sides.
Consumers can feel very empowered by a few hundred followers and one bad experience. And that translates more into a diss track, embelished and dramatized, than an honest review. Entrepreneurs justifiably fear this because this can hurt their businesses significantly. So they fight back with this legal retcon attempt. It’s most likely not enforceable - and they probably know that too. If they wouldn’t mind you speaking positively about you online, they cannot keep the negative stuff out either (as long as it is based in fact, libel is a different story). This little boiler plate serves only to give pause to the consumer. It plants a seed of restraint in their minds (if they actually read it).
Humans are a complicated species.
It is there to give men an idea of what childbirth is like. (Tongue very much in cheek)