You can replace the OS on most Android devices.

Specifically- devices made by Google have been unlocked allowing replacement of the software.

You still have to put together a working kernel and drivers, environment, etc.

Not much stopping folks from doing that though.

GrapheneOS, Ubuntu, and others have made headway for some devices.

Each device potentially uses different hardware implementation and features.

Or, maybe writing firmware and code that doesn’t make money is the opposite of profit.

Where is the incentive to write code that reduces security and costs money they won’t recover ?

This is a crowdstrike issue specifically related to the falcon sensor. Happens to affect only windows hosts.

For the technically inclined - crowdstrike notice: https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/statement-on-windows-sensor-update/

A lot of old consoles are actually based on standard CPUs for the most part. Look at the history of the 6502 for example. Emulating the hardware can be done if time is taken to reverse engineer all the layers into an emulator.

Part of the issue, to me, can be if all the work is done and then copyright disputes arise- all work has to be removed from the public.

This was a fast response, and doesn’t cover the whole scope of handling networking in docker. As mentioned elsewhere there is a different network philosophy for Standalone Containers & Overlay networking.

You declare the ip in your setup, or in the yaml file. An example for the docker-compose file is in the link below. I’d expect you’ll want to declare the network and such as well, if you’re not familiar.

https://gist.github.com/natcl/3d881d00a56c8a961e6dab8ba51a5a37

The comment I was making was regarding wildlife. Above, you specifically made a check mark talking about wildlife. My comment was on topic to your comment.

Human population is affected by the climate of our planet. Part of the reason we don’t have more people is also climate related.

We’re going to drive most wildlife extinct by the currently unfolding action, population size notwithstanding. The damage is done.

This better outcome you speak of doesn’t account for the fact that we’re not changing our behavior now. We should have changed these things 20 years ago.

The current messaging is that we have only 15 years left to figure this out and Limit the increase to 1.5c.

We already failed hard, it’s a question of how much collateral damage to the ecosystem will we cause.

Wildlife will not be ok.

Humans and societies in general will be distressed.

This event might be a large test of our longevity as a species.

The planet will be fine and has been through worse.

I thought the current conclusion is: we’re at the tipping point now that would allow most wildlife to persevere. We need to be changing course now or yesterday to save the majority of even most if any at all. There are efforts, but most habitats are on course for nearly irreversible modifications. Humanity will survive, at the cost of other wildlife on the planet.