I like your idea. But you’ll have to settle for being a fish.
Sounds like some firmware updates are in order.
Well, now I’m gonna. You can’t tell me what to do! /s
This “article” reads like a long-form cover letter for a job application. Thanks for enshittifying everything, Jagan, and using your bullshit “skills” to go for that cash grab before the bubble pops.
If this article wasn’t written by one of Jagan’s LLMs and was in fact written by a real person (and I would be shocked to find that it was), the author should feel bad and demand a refund on their education.
I’m with you, but it’s already normalized and the laws aren’t on our side (plus there’s an entire party trying to further erode worker’s rights).
I just discovered that search engines have started heavily including AI shit in their picture results. Why would I want an entire social-network-worth’s of that?
Not if you make it yourself. Saves baking time, cost of purchasing store-bought cookie dough, and cost of electricity.
Plus, it tastes better, because it doesn’t have to have weird shelf stabilizers.
What? The “strongman defender of freedum of spech” Melon Husk is actually a weak little baby that folded like a wet cardboard box? Wow, I’m shocked.
Maybe connecting a server to your network, giving it implicit trust, and leaving the default login credentials was a dumb move…
There’s at least eight AITA communities.
Honestly, this is the question people should be asking in response. I totally get the gut reaction against censorship, but I don’t think anyone would agree that Facebook, Xitter, etm. are innocent, neutral parties in all of this.
Part of the issue (as the article points out) is that those companies have been allowed to essentially craft people’s internal narrative, often amplifying our worst impulses and inclinations—all in service of making the black line go up for investors.
So is banning social media for teens the correct path forward? Maybe in the short term, but until we direct the governance to the companies creating the problems in the first place, we’re almost certainly going to have this conversation again in the future.
It’s still an ad, intentional or not, mainly because of the unrestrained, almost hyperbolic positivity. It sounds almost exactly like a pitch to investors, assuring them that they can invest in this totally-not-a-fad tech scheme. Also, it’s a wall of text…
Which is exactly what I’d expect from a LLM that doesn’t actually comprehend what it’s writing but instead plagiarizes and amalgamates businesses pitches and internet fanboy screed.
It’s not a copyright suit, it’s a patent suit. So it’s indeed just like the Apple suit, though what patents were infringed upon is still unknown as of now.
Eat shit, Nintendo. I hope you lose and experience the Streisand effect.
Maybe it’s the absurd amount of wealth concentrated in the top 10% that’s multiple times more than the bottom 90% combined…? But, nah. I’m sure those economics will be trickling down any day, now.
I help pay for my instance to operate, and it’s a cost I’m happy to help shoulder.
Through let’s be frank: movie theaters want you to smell popcorn, so you buy snacks. Smell-o-Vision would have to be more lucrative than a $15 bucket of popcorn.
Another one called FluxTube and one called magic-tape were posted recently, too.