• 6 Posts
  • 238 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 4th, 2023

help-circle

  • Why the actual fuck 73 years? (It was exactly 73 years, right? Not like 72 years, 362 days, 7 hours or something, right?) Some power of two or power of ten would make more sense, right?

    I suppose it’s possible that 73 years is exactly a power of two nanoseconds or something? (In fact, it looks to be very close to 2^61 nanoseconds. log_base_2(73*365.2425*24*60*60*1000*1000*1000) is 60.998632. The difference from exactly 61 could be because 365.2425 isn’t sufficiently precise for the number of days in a year.)

    But then, if there was going to be a single-bit corruption in the time, it’s really weird and coincidental that it would be the specific bit that’s makes it almost exactly an even-number of years. So that seems unlikely as well.

    I’m stumped, but curious as fuck.









  • TootSweet@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldvi or emacs?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Vi.

    Honestly, Vim is too heavy for me. I wish I could get a reasonable text editor with:

    • No built-in programming languages.
    • Vi(m)-style modal editing and keys.
    • No GUI. Terminal is good, thanks.
    • Not a lot of moving parts.
    • Infinite undo. (I’m ambivolent about an undo/redo “tree” feature like Vim has.)
    • Visual mode like Vim has.
    • Simple syntax highlighting would be a plus, but not a must-have.
    • Stable. As in doesn’t crash.

    Vim fails on #1, #4, and #7. (It has syntax highlighting, but not simple highlighting.)

    I usually just use the vi that is pre-installed on Arch Linux. (I use Arch Linux btw. Bite me. 😈) But it fails on #5, #6, #7, and #8. (It segfaults randomly a lot.) But I guess those issues haven’t been deal breakers enough to make me switch to something else.

    I have used nvi in the past. I ended up leaving it for the Arch pre-installed vi. Don’t remember particuarly why now.

    Maybe one day I’ll write my own text editor and ascend to full neckbeardhood.






  • TootSweet@lemmy.worldtoGeneral Discussion@lemmy.worldDoes this plan make sense?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago
    • Yes.
    • Yes.
    • Basically because influence in the senate isn’t scaled by population? I can get behind that. Any other reasons?
    • Why? (Aside from that it’s stuffed with Trump appointees and insurrectionists right now, I mean.)
    • Hadn’t heard of this before, but what little I’m seeing about it sounds good.
    • Obviously.
    • I’m definitely not up on this one.
    • Maybe, but only if we introduce something else that’ll have rich people actually paying taxes (for real). Otherwise, reform income tax.

    And ones you’ve neglected:

    • Abolish corporate personhood
    • Wealth tax
    • UBI
    • Constitutionally-protected reproductive rights
    • Abolish 2A
    • Abolish private prisons
    • Abolish forced labor

    And if we’re allowed to include things probably well outside the Overton Window:

    • Abolish private property, prison, cops, military, borders, employment, the profit motive, corporations
    • To each according to need

    That’s just off the top of my head.