I see what you mean after looking up co-opted. I was looking for a term that indicates joined by to influence and amplify for your own goals. Yes, feminism has brought about good and real tangible change, but it was also used as a major distraction (my original claim).

As you said, the first wave was indeed racist and many parts of feminism are still targeted at the white, middle class woman. The outrage for the sexual assault on a white woman is magnitudes larger than that of a colored woman. Colored women are also taken less seriously by medical professionals as well as the judiciary. There was a documentary in Germany about how non-white women are treated by doctors and it was disgusting to see how they were brushed off as “it’s in their culture to exaggerate”. The same happens in France to Muslim women.

More like your reading comprehension is 0.

Wat?

I’m not sure why you’re saying “no”. It doesn’t seem like you’re contradicting at all. The 60s were second wave feminism.

Of course, but the point is how much energy is put into what. We should be putting most of our energy into resolving the wealth gap, but instead we’re deeply divided and easily get distracted. Celebrities, feminism, blm, “immigrants”, movies, TV series, games, … . In doses they are fine, but the minority cares about solving wealth distribution and don’t vote on solutions.

Amen. Couldn’t have put it better.

Keep voting “against immigrants”. Surely they are to blame for everything wrong in this world. Just as “the queers”. Anybody different in fact is the problem, especially if they are less fortunate than you, and doubly more if they cannot defend themselves. Those that are successful, rich and powerful though, earned it all by themselves and are fully deserving of it. They are just trying to help this country. Don’t you dare look up to see where money is going. Look down.

Gotta blame the “immigrants” before looking up.

!twnw@fedia.io

I don’t understand your reasoning. Do you think being married is less complicated than not being married? That logically doesn’t make sense. Doing nothing (not getting married) will always be less complicated than doing something (getting married).

Why do you need a symbolic commitment instead of just commitment? 17-30 is a period full of change for many people. You might decide to study or pursue a vocation in different places, you might find out one wants the city and another a small town, you might find out your political ideologies are in the midst of a major change, and so on.

It doesn’t really seem as if you’re actually open to another opinion but you’re looking for affirmation that you’re making the right choice. Maybe ask yourself why you need that affirmation. Do you want the same things? Which dreams do you have? Which plans? Where do you stand politically and ideologically? What does marriage mean to either of you? Did you have the idea of marriage by yourselves? Was it parents, or society, or media, or really just you who had the idea?

Marriage isn’t a fairytale. More than half of them fail. If your reaction to my comment is “fuck you, I’ll show them”, then you’re definitely getting married for the wrong reason. Just be clear about your reasons. If they are genuine and you both are on board. Then go for it.

Erurt?

https://removepaywalls.com/https://www.wired.com/story/sex-workers-built-an-anti-onlyfans-to-take-control-of-their-profits/

So not my world. Never heard of either of these women. (Stella Barey and Ms Rhoades). I hope that creator-owned means they don’t become what they hate. Only time will tell.

Did they make something like in the film? That looked pretty workable.

For some people it’s the only way they think they can have a romantic, human connection.

That thing they used to run on in Ready Player One is actually referenced pretty often when VR is talked about. Omnidirectional platform or something. I think that black tech youtuber (his name end in HD) also mentioned it in one of his videos when he went to Disney where they are testing a different design but with the same goal.

Honestly, if they made that thing, it would be pretty cool.

No. There’s no guarantee they won’t get greedy and start selling my data anyway. They’d have to have a really good pitch and some way to back it up that would get me to pay. I yet know what it is, but I haven’t seen it yet.

That fucker should be taxed into the ground.

SG-1 was great and dwindling towards the end. They ended there to at least stop when they were goo. You could see the effects of modern hollywood creeping in those last 2 seasons. Atlantis was already embracing modern hollywood, and Universe was the death knell to the franchise.

They should’ve left it dead. Now they’re going to try and raise a zombie, put make-up and lipstick on it, then kill it so that newer generations can remember Stargate as “oh, that shitty series?”.

*Aluminium hat on*

They are reintroducing it to try and capitalise on the “it was aliens” meme. They are hoping to get a lot of viewership from the fringe and conspiracy theorists that will truly believe the pyramids were landing platforms for alien motherships.

“I will not learn from the past but repeat my mistakes and keep wishing for the best”

- a small mind

We are so easily controlled.

In this picture: Musk whining about trans-rights instead of focusing on getting to Mars