I mean, I’m sure you could bribe your way into the Russian basketball team as a substitute that never plays
I mean, I’m sure you could bribe your way into the Russian basketball team as a substitute that never plays
Having also worked in a middle school, I’m pretty sure it’s the hormones
I have several friends who are trans men who have reported to me that the urge started after they started testosterone. It always makes me smile :)
It’s their way of saying that trans women aren’t women and trans men aren’t men. It’s less of a technicality thing and more of a “I’m going to be skeptical about this person’s intentions until I see more”
Trans women are women and trans men are men.
As somebody who is nonbinary, I dream as some version of myself.
Also, please use “trans women” and “trans men”. Removing the space is a TERF red flag.
I think I look good in heels. They accentuate my amazing calves.
They’re designed to give the illusion of a longer leg, and long legs are traditionally seen as a desirable trait for women to have.
There are a few there, but nothing to support your initial claim of it being rampant
Then you should be able to link to the mod log of the removed stuff
I haven’t seen anybody praising the shooter. I have seen about bunch of gallows humor. Is that what you’re talking about?
Please, they’re in Mexico or Korea when something like this happens
I mean, since Biden changed the meaning it “ceasefire” to mean “temporary pause”, then of course he would be ok. Gives the IDF a chance to reload.
Integration with their other products. And I’m too old to enjoy fiddling with stuff anymore.
That’s kind of my point. $18 per person is a ridiculous cost. They have a population of ~37,000 people. It would be less inexcusable if it were in Dallas (~1.3m). I mean, police stations don’t need vehicles like that at all, but it’s even more disgusting that a town that small spent money on that.
It’s part of the Dallas/Ft Worth metro, but that cost is something like $18 per person in the town.
Ask for an itemized bill.
I would normally agree, but when it comes to Israel, all bets are off, even for The Atlantic.
I’m not disagreeing with you about it being incorrectly advertised. I’m saying the headline is written to imply that the bible specifically excludes only the amendments that apply to slavery and women. That is not the case. In fact, the only place in the article that mentions that exact fact is the headline. So while it is technically true to say that it excludes those amendments, it is, at best, misleading. Why not say it “excludes amendment to handle the death of a president”? That is also technically true.
So what I’m saying is: you’re engaging in Lemmy’s second past time, bashing someone for calling out something that’s misleading because the implication fits your narrative.
It can both be reporting the facts and be rage bait. A headline that said “Trump Bible only contains the Bill of Rights and not the rest of the Constitution” would also be factual, but it doesn’t push the narrative that Trump is anti-black and anti-woman.
Don’t get me wrong, I think Trump is absolutely anti-black and anti-woman, but the headline is absolutely ragebait. It is selective to get people to click it.
The irony is that the poor behavior explains why many women would pick the bear
I would legit buy that.