I would say crespelle. But even those are made with more eggs. Usually the version similar to OP’s I make them with milk and flour + a single egg, so they are lighter.

I think it’s similar in Czech, and in our (Italian) family, my mother’s side is Austrian and “palacinken” (some italianized german word) has been a family dish forever.

…who doesn’t consider Italians properly civilized people?

Any profit requires charging more than cost. Nobody is talking about infinite. In fact games after a few years end up costing pennies.

You are literally arguing nothing. Devs have the right to profit off their labor.

Basically nothing is sold to cover the cost. That’s the basic of how making a profit works. So let’s start from there. Second, when you make a digital product, you invest X and you have no idea how many copies you will sell. It’s much harder to compute the marginal cost compared to a physical item. Videogames are a luxury item, they are by no means necessary. So there is no harm in letting demand and offer regulate the price. If you feel that paying a certain amount is not worth for a game, you don’t pay it, or you wait until the price drops.

I picked up civilization VI (for my PC), hades and outer wilds for my deck.

That’s how sales of anything works. Everything is sold at the highest possible price that people are willing to pay.

Saving lives isn’t a “relative concept.” I said nobody will be brought out of poverty from this, which is true.

No it’s not.

The fact that you keep denying it, doesn’t mean I need to debunk jack. You are saying “you can’t be brought out of poverty, because in a global perspective if you earn more than 3$ a day, you are not poor”, or at least, I am paraphrasing. I am saying that’s bullshit, because poverty is a relative concept and you can absolutely be poor even if you are above what is globally considered the threshold of poverty.

I am focusing on this part because it is the basis of your argument. Also:

• you have realistically no idea about the condition of the people who benefit from this
• being in debt is a situation that in itself can cause people to take their own lives, making your statement also arbitrary (no life was saved)

Calling poor people in the first world rich is again, dumb. Deal with this, no organization that focuses on poverty does it, and nobody would consider - say - a welfare check “keeping money on the top”.

I don’t know if you genuinely don’t get class divisions or if you just search for conflict online (I have seen you around…).

You are completely missing the fact that poverty is a relative concept. Using global parameters to decide that poor people in rich countries are rich is so out of touch that I cannot even describe it.

There are whole studies made on the effect of relative poverty, in case you want to expand your horizons.

I think their customer base is basically 90% made of people that - like me - would quit in a second.

Good thing is that there is no vendor lock, it would be a shame, but changing search engine is quite simple.

Yeah, I agree. In general I will personally try to evaluate if the good that comes from a company succeeding outweighs the fact it’s a US company. I won’t use a dogmatic approach, but I will definitely be careful to choose even more carefully than before.

I don’t know the details, so maybe there is a reason, but I am not part of the “outraged” crowd. I think kagi use case is neat and innovative, bot protection is meh

Since they implemented privacy pass, there is now something stopping them from doing both. See https://help.kagi.com/kagi/privacy/privacy-pass.html

Obviously with it you trade the need to trust them for your own personalization (as they can’t know it was you searching).

Sure, but they don’t (their privacy policy is exemplary). They have a whole shpiel about their business model. Just few weeks back they released a feature that makes it technically impossible for them to see who did searches, so no trust is needed anymore. They implemented a very novel protocol, quite cool.

I have doubts considering they are an american company, but I want to see them succeed. Plus, they are remote, so at least a good chunk of the income taxes from salaries are going outside the US.

Why would they do what Google etc. do, but much worse? It makes sense that they do scrape what google etc. most likely miss (and that’s what their index is about). Even a company with Microsoft resources tried and failed to scrape the web as a whole (failed in the sense results are worse).

Open source analytics tools are still pushing for ad-driven business models that make the world (and the content) worse. Open source LLMs still waste computational power and pollute. And the list continues. Some open source technologies serve a good goal, some contribute to make the world as bad as some non-OSS.

Kant song costs Kant singer her can’t sing. [Semicit.]

You are not though. That’s the point. You are making up bullshit to pretend you are to use “pointing out racism” as a moral shield. Pathetic, in fact.

You are trying to fabricate sympathy for Russians in a post where nobody is attacking them (as russians), about Ukraine military aid. You know what you are doing, you can make the paraculo as much as you want.

I can try all the atlas. It’s not a matter of which country. I am contesting the principle.