• randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m fooling around with a few samba AD docker containers. I ask because I’ve phased almost everything else out of my lab environment.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The problem with Samba AD in a container or Samba in container is that Samba isn’t designed to be run in a temporary environment. You could run it in a LXC container but anything beyond that will break things in the short or long term.

        • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I figured you could get around some of the storage limitations with something like persistent volume claims. I’m testing it out at the moment. I am a big fan of LXC.

          I see a few people have created docker Samba Containers and I’m giving them a whirl. Can’t say much for stability but I think it’s an interesting experiment.

          I know in the past smb server didn’t work in LXC containers because certain kernel modules caused conflicts.

          A man can dream.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            If you manage to create persistent containers how are you going to update them down the road? Like I have said previously, Samba isn’t designed in a way that allows for effectively hot swapping system components.

            It seems like it would better to create a VM template and then setup a fail over cluster. Just make sure you have a time server somewhere on the network.

            If you are dead set on containers you could try LDAP in a container. I just don’t think active directory was built for Linux containerization.