Honestly, the title is a click bait title. I read the article and the title could have been more topical with the same amount of words. It’s a bullshit title. Oh hey it’s the Guardian.
Sorry for tacking in with an unrelated question, but as someone who isn’t from an English-speaking country, could you elaborate as to what your last phrase means? Is the guardian considered a bad news outlet? I had the vague impression the brand was associated with more or less “better” quality reporting and/or journalism in general, and can remember donating to them years ago. I now wonder if something has changed of if I was supporting something bad in my ignorance 😕
Honestly, the title is a click bait title. I read the article and the title could have been more topical with the same amount of words. It’s a bullshit title. Oh hey it’s the Guardian.
Sorry for tacking in with an unrelated question, but as someone who isn’t from an English-speaking country, could you elaborate as to what your last phrase means? Is the guardian considered a bad news outlet? I had the vague impression the brand was associated with more or less “better” quality reporting and/or journalism in general, and can remember donating to them years ago. I now wonder if something has changed of if I was supporting something bad in my ignorance 😕
The guardian has a tendency to have alarmist headlines.