A_A@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · 1 year ago[meta] Lack of posting rules in /c/sciencemessage-squaremessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up123arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up121arrow-down1message-square[meta] Lack of posting rules in /c/scienceA_A@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTH1NKTHRICE@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoGood idea in principle. Do peer-reviewed journals only count as credible? If not, what is your proposed criteria?
minus-squarehaui@lemmy.giftedmc.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI mean, using peer teviewed journals and „credible“ in the same sentence these days is quite gutsy, ngl. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point
Good idea in principle. Do peer-reviewed journals only count as credible? If not, what is your proposed criteria?
I mean, using peer teviewed journals and „credible“ in the same sentence these days is quite gutsy, ngl. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point