Bridgy Fed made a splash earlier this week by announcing its latest progress in connecting the Fediverse to Bluesky and Nostr. Sadly, not everyone was welcoming.

  • Blaze@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Makes want to fork the project and host a copy of the bridge that’s opt-out.

    Wouldn’t you get defederated fast too?

    • Corvid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s exactly the point. Isolationists instances can always defederate bridges if they don’t like them. This outrage is them imposing their will on the rest of the fediverse.

      • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Framing it as isolationists is ludicrous.

        I love the idea of an Internet without borders, but there needs to be some shared values. That’s what the ActivityPub protocol provides a platform for. To suggest that everything we do or post should be free is ridiculous. If the communities of BlueSky and Nostfr want to access our content, why don’t they switch to ActivityPub and problem solved?

        As a point, say that I write a poem and put it on my mastodon and then bridgey scrapes it and copies it. How do we get that taken down? A picture of my kid? A picture of someone else’s kid?

        There’s absolutely no issues with ActivityPub growing, it can encompass the whole internet for all I care, but that needs to come with the protections, provisions and failsafes that the ActivityPub protocol offers. Bridgey doesn’t do that, so again I say… If BlueSky and Nostfr want to pivot to ActivityPub, they’re more than welcome, but the Internet I’m trying to build isn’t about profiting off of small people without a voice and that’s what Bridgey and this isolationism rhetoric tries to do.

        • Corvid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Bridgy doesn’t scrape anything. It works the same as any other ActivityPub instance, the only difference is that it converts some JSON from one format to another.

          It also converts edit and deletion events, so in your scenario it would relay that you want your poem or photo deleted.

          This isn’t a web scrapper that reposts content like all the bots reposting Reddit threads to Lemmy. This is a protocol translator between federated networks that speak different languages.

          • Hominine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Crickets

            Small wonder. A tangent, but I’m also of the opinion that someone shouldn’t put their child’s photo (or any information) on the internet if they don’t want to distribute it in the first place.

            • Corvid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Not entirely sure what you mean by that. It deletes posts in the same way that any other ActivityPub server does, by federating the deletion request.

              It’s up to the receiving servers to handle that request and delete the post. You can easily have an ActivityPub native server that doesn’t honor those requests.

          • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I found the bridgy website a bit confusing, but people who areupset should read through to get a better idea of what it actually does.

            Initially I thought it was just scraping and reposting too, but I find what the dev is working towards is very much in the spirit of the fediverse.

            • 0x1C3B00DA@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              It doesn’t scrape or facilitates scrapping. Your server sends your posts to the bridge and it federates it to other servers. That’s how federation works. If you define that as facilitating scraping, then every instance on the fediverse facilitates scraping.

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                The largest Mastodon instance (mastodon.social) has 360k MAU. This means that one can crawl all of its activities with less than 5 requests per second, every day.

                Even with rate limits, the Fediverse is still so small that I could crawl the top 10 mastodon instances in less than a day.

                From my desktop PC.

                On my shitty DSL.

                Anyone thinking that bullying one developer into a well-meaning project will be enough to keep their “secret clubs” away from malicious actors are in for a sad realization.

        • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          ActivityPub doesn’t guarantee your post gets taken down on other instances after you delete it. Federation with another site isn’t more a less trustworthy just because it uses AP proper or a bridge.

          I think that everyone being on the same protocol is better for compatibility and UX but I think bridges can have their place for those who choose to use them until then.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          why don’t they switch to ActivityPub and problem solved immediately get defederated

          FTFY. That’s what would actually happen, and you and me both know it. 😛

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s what the ActivityPub protocol provides a platform for.

          That’s ridiculous. ActivityPub is a standard to allow communication between different systems. What you are saying is that people should only be allowed to speak English if they want to be part of the British Empire and be subjects to the crown.

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              No user cares about the language an application is written in, only about its features.

              Also, should Python developers not be allowed to use Rust libraries through bindings? What a weird and broken analogy.

              • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                To be honest, I don’t know enough about either Rust or Python to continue with this analogy 😂