Debian has way less overhead out of the box so in theory it should save a company a decent amount of money. I’m trying to calculate actual numbers and I’m curious if any of you have done any similar calculation.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Computing resource usage of your OS should be indistinguishable from $0 almost everywhere.

    • e_t_@kbin.pithyphrase.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      OK, and compared to what? “Less” is a comparison, but you didn’t specify what you’re comparing Debian to.
      Out-of-the-box RAM usage is a pretty specious metric because you’re not installing Debian (or any other OS) just to have sit there in its out-of-the-box condition. Do you think a Debian server running Apache with 1000 vhosts will use less RAM than a RHEL server running nginx with 10 vhosts?

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Debian uses like 200MBs of ram for a basic fresh install. That’s negligible.

      Unless you’re deploying 500 virtual machines on a single server, that all run a single simple basic task the base ram usage of the OS shouldn’t even be a factor.