• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, the problem is the people who incorrectly merge early, making “rushing” possible.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am not calling it rushing because they are passing, but because they are going a significantly higher speed when starting to merge, requiring them to slam on the brakes and cause the same issues that merging too early causes.

      Like going 20+ mph over the posted speed, not just going the speed limit in the open lane.

      People who stay in the open lane and don’t pass in the no passing zone and just zipper merge at the end are not the people I am talking about when I say rushing.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, and the real fault lies with the early mergers who cause the open lane to exist in the first place, not the opportunistic drivers who fill it.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Early mergers don’t make people speed in the open lane and abruptly merge in an unsafe manner.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can either work with human nature, or try to work against it. But if you choose the latter, you’re gonna have a bad time.

            As someone with a background in traffic engineering, I care about what actually works. Making yourself feel good by passing judgement on drivers doesn’t actually do anything to solve the problem.

            • snooggums@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you saying that human nature is to speed in the open lane if other people merge early?

                • snooggums@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Because it is stupid to blame early merging people instead of just assuming the speeders are the same people that speed and do shitty sudden lane changes in normal traffic.

                  • grue@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You don’t get it: the blame doesn’t matter. What matters is designing the built environment in such a way as to afford good behaviors and preclude (or at least discourage) bad ones.

                    That’s why traffic calming works much better than merely putting in speed limit signs with lower numbers on them, for instance, and why I really liked this suggestion elsewhere in the thread.