• johnthedoe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Vanilla pods didn’t sell well cos ANC is pretty much a standard these days. The money you’d spend on them you might as well reach for the pros. Apple have been flooding the market with endless variety for a while now. Definitely not the simple and clean product line like back in the day.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      But the article said that the vanilla Gen 3s aren’t selling because people are still buying new 2s.

      There is a market for vanilla headphones. It’s the middle tier that’s doesn’t make sense.

      The 2s can often be purchased for $100, and the 3s are often more expansive that the Gen 1 Pros when they’re on sale.

      All in all, AirPod 3s are a weird in-between product that doesn’t make sense.

      • johnthedoe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which makes me worry that they would rather scrap the 2 at that price range and make 3 the base cheaper (but more expensive) price.

        3 definitely feels like a bit of an after thought product. I’m just glad they’re not touching the pros for a while. Literally just bought the usbc one on a sale this week

  • nezbyte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article doesn’t even mention the change in AirPods’ “one-size fits most” design. Most people I know have refused to go past 2nd gen due to the new fit.

    • Hazzard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly, my wife mentioned just last week that she doesn’t like her AirPod 3’s due to the fit, and that she’s considering asking for a new pair of 2’s this Christmas instead. Glad to hear they might be going back on that design change, for her sake.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Uh, yes it does absolutely mention that.

      But curiously, Gurman says that neither is likely to include replaceable silicone ear tips; we’ll probably get the same one-size-fits-most, open-air design that the standard AirPods have always had.

      • nezbyte@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        My issue is that the article doesn’t address that Apple changed the physical design of the AirPods with Gen 3 so it sits in the ear or more accurately falls out of the ear differently. It is a completely different ear design when compared to the Gen 1&2 AirPods or wired EarPods. 2021 Apple AirPods Announcement

        The new design of AirPods is lightweight and contoured, sitting at just the right angle for comfort and to direct audio into the ear.

        • mriguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I liked the change. The 1’s were always falling out of my ears, the 3’s felt secure. But the pros are better than either for me.

          • nezbyte@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pros with the Comply foam tips are my current favorites. The 3s were pretty good once I put some grip stickers on them.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they ditch the silicone tips, how are they expecting to achieve premium fit and noise cancelling? Seems like a bad move IMO.

        • Fades@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          As an owner of the AirPods 1 and the Pro, I absolutely agree.

          Personally even with the changeable tips I’ve had issues with fit and staying in over a short period of time, so this just feels like further backwards in functionality, configurability, and comfort.

          All around what-the-fuck-is-this bs

          • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, it’s still a rumor at this point, so who knows what’s actually going to happen. If they actually do that, I’m going to stick with my current buds until they die. If buying second hand buds doesn’t work out, I may have to go back to Bose or Sennheiser.

  • Nogami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really wish Apple would launch a service partnered with an audiology company to make custom moulded earpieces. I’d buy a set in a heartbeat.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Basically people buy the cheapest AirPods, the 2s, or the Pros with ANC. Not the middle ground.

    The weird middle tier just doesn’t sell well. If you don’t want ANC, you can get new 2s for a lot less. And if you really want spatial audio, you might as well spend an extra few bucks to get the pros or some refurbished pros. They might even been cheaper than the MSRP 3s if you go with Gen 1 Pros.

    I feel like most people probably buy 3s because they are a good fit for a specific ear shape. If you’re comparing features and prices, they’re an odd choice.