• Hypx@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Modern tanks leak very little. Large underground cavern stores even at very low cost. You are just out of date on your information.

    It doesn’t matter what you think you are advocating for. Your rhetoric is basically just oil & gas propaganda. At best, you can accept that you were fooled by it.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Modern tanks leak very little.

      I don’t think you understand how embrittlement works, or what the problem is. Define “very little”, and over how long of a lifespan?

      Large underground cavern stores even at very low cost.

      Well, that’s not very reliable for setting up grid storage is it? I mean, you have to have a suitable cavern.

      You are just out of date on your information.

      Still waiting on some sources… so far you haven’t provided any information, only opinions.

      • Hypx@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        You clearly don’t yourself, since tanks are made of carbon fiber. Embrittlement is very alloy dependent too. Choose the right alloy and it is a non-issue.

        There are vast quantities of suitable underground caverns. It gives many orders of magnitude more storage capacity than any other idea, including pump hydro (which is significantly more geographically limited).

        It’s sad that you claim knowledge, but you can’t be bothered to google it. There are many studies out there like this one: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223028481