• Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 个月前

        No it isn’t. It has no tenets, no holy books, no authority figures. By definition it is a lack of a religion.

        • Pratai@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 个月前

          You’re talking about how it SHOULD be. Not how it it’s becoming. And besides- I’m talking about internet “atheism,” not atheism. On the Internet, a truism is basically just hatred as smugness. And it’s evolving into a full-on religion.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 个月前

        There is a difference between a belief system and a religion. Beleg in the scientific method, for instance, is not a religion. In fact it is the only belief system that seeks out to falsify it’s tenets. Also it presupposes no overbearing creator or idea.

        However not all atheists have the same belief system, however non believers in a god, hence a-theos. One you get those involved you’re becoming a religion.

        • QuaffPotions@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 个月前

          Yeah to be honest I just didn’t feel like digging into the nuances. There is atheism (nonreligious), and there is Atheism (religious). And to be clear, that’s totally fine. I have nothing against a/Atheism, only anti-theism or any other form of religious exclusivism.

          • Akasazh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 个月前

            Fair enough. It is a bit of nuance your should consider sharing, as some people in this sub feel antagonized by the idea of being labeled religious. I know that might be the exact self-identifying and group type dynamic that you may equate with religion (I would disagree, but that’s another thing).

            However putting it as bluntly as you did might not help in getting your point across, and that’s a shame as it is actually an interesting area for discussion.

      • Pratai@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 个月前

        I get what you’re saying, but it’s not. It’s an ideology. However- with the blind hatred of others who chose to believe differently, they may as well rebrand and become Christianity minus a god.