So far there’s subscriptions for cruise control, adaptive beams, various navigation options, apple/google integration and my favorite, dual-zone climate.

  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    10 months ago

    A fifth of users in the US rent the car itself via lease mechanisms. You aren’t the target.

    Assuming there are discounts the folks leasing will use these options.

    • misterdoctor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why are you all over this thread shilling for a predatory subscription model by a multibillion dollar corporation? Very strange behavior.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Because this thread is an echo chamber. I know pointing out the target use case is very problematic and odd. I’ll be quite and you all can continue to ignore that a fifth of buyers rent the entire vehicle for 3 years and haven’t been doing it for 50.

        • misterdoctor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not even saying you’re wrong necessarily, but it’s just very weird behavior to take this aggressive of a pro-corporate stance on something I think everyone should agree is a shitty, unnecessary practice. Regardless of the use case, locking features behind a paywall is always a shitty thing for a multibillion dollar company to do.

          • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            People like the option. It’s not weird at all to believe that having different options for owning, leading, and renting allows more access to the vehicle and products. The original comment is about limiting how I pay for a car. Leasing+ subscription works for many customers.

            • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              10 months ago

              People like the option to have already installed equipment just not work if they don’t pay the subscription? Like the car already has the features and the company is saying “we included this equipment in the price of your lease/purchase already but if you’d like to use it you have to keep paying more.”

              Even in the case of a lease, this is just anti-consumer bullshit

              • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                10 months ago

                With BMW and Toyota it was cheaper to sub for 3 years than purchase outright. Yes, that’s an attractive option.

                • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  That’s not what I said. Good strawman/whataboutism combo, but try harder.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              A leased car with those options 5 years ago didn’t cost you a subscription, and now they will. You want the option to what? Pay more for something that you didn’t have to before?

              • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Again, on both the Toyota and BMW, it was less expensive than purchasing the options. You did pay for them before. They were never free.

                • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Not true. Just think about what you’re saying for five seconds and you’ll realize how absurd it is. If you buy a BMW or a Toyota that has an available heated seat subscription for example, whether you pay for it or not, they installed the heated seats. it doesn’t cost BMW or Toyota a cent for you to use your heated seats, it costs them to install them. You really think that you haven’t already paid for those heated seats that they’ve already installed in the car? are you seriously suggesting that these companies are going to to sell you these cars with heated seats in them without charging you for them? That if you choose not to pay for the heated seats, they’re just going to eat that cost? Get real.

                  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    It is far cheaper to produce a single trim with most of the features. Customization costs money. There is a reason Porsches are expensive.

                    Multiple seat types is literally buildings and lines they need to construct. It’s a similar scales of economy concept like binning chips. Instead of multiple lines.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m so fucking sorry I pointed out the reality of people purchasing these cars. I’ll promise to never point out any data to you again if you just don’t block me!

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Have they excluded that audience? As far as I know you can still purchase the vehicle or feature instead of lease.

        • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Only by upgrading to the MMI navigation system do you get access to the app store. From there, Audi forces you into add-ons like adaptive cruise control or Apple CarPlay and Android Auto for a one-month, six-month, one-year, or three-year subscription. Or you can just purchase any of those features permanently—although Audi doesn’t say for how much.

          Sounds like you’re right, but people are still right to be wary of this scheme, as the additional market segmentation will likely push up the cost of buying the feature outright. Audi is incentivized to push as many people toward the subscription model as possible to decrease the value of used vehicles.

          • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I will worry when it happens. The car market is very competitive and vehicle reliability, safety, and feature set has improved significantly in the last 15 years.