Possibly linux@lemmy.zip to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoPet DNA testing company in doghouse after identifying human as canine | Dogs | The Guardianwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1193arrow-down19 cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldnottheonion@lemmy.worldweirdnews@real.lemmy.fanandfinally@feddit.uknews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1184arrow-down1external-linkPet DNA testing company in doghouse after identifying human as canine | Dogs | The Guardianwww.theguardian.comPossibly linux@lemmy.zip to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square9fedilink cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldnottheonion@lemmy.worldweirdnews@real.lemmy.fanandfinally@feddit.uknews@lemmy.world
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down10·edit-27 months agoThis title is a trap. Pet (is) DNA-testing (a) company in (it’s) doghouse after identifying human(s) as canine? Pet-DNA-testing (through) (a) company in doghouse… ?
minus-squareIzzyScissor@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 months agoA Company that tests pet DNA is “in the doghouse” for falsely identifying human DNA as canine DNA. It parses like every other headline, so I don’t know why it’s that confusing.
This title is a trap.
Pet (is) DNA-testing (a) company in (it’s) doghouse after identifying human(s) as canine?
Pet-DNA-testing (through) (a) company in doghouse… ?
A Company that tests pet DNA is “in the doghouse” for falsely identifying human DNA as canine DNA.
It parses like every other headline, so I don’t know why it’s that confusing.