• blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, you’re okay with being under the control of a company only showing you what they want.

      • blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, you are okay with your search provider deciding what is misinformation and what is not.

        Seems like a slippery slope to me.

        • skeezix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          As long as they’re objectively deciding then yes. There really isn’t a decision to be made; information is either misinformation or not misinformation. There is no grey area for subjectivity. There is no room for opinion or interpretation. As long as they maintain a track record of being objective then it’s good.

        • stillwater@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Considering how far gone people hopped up on misinformation have become over the past decade, you’re looking in the wrong direction about where the slippery slope is.

          There are simple, objective standards to suss out good information from bad. We have seen that people are simply not good about filtering it out for themselves and will fall for misinformation purposefully if it serves their prejudices. Why not have an independent body verifying if information is worthwhile or not?

          All the people who bring up this nonsense are usually the types who are mad stuff like “COVID is a liberal hoax” is being suppressed.