(does not reflect my opinion, just thought it looked funny)

Less hostile when in context.

Taken from a YouTube channel called Not Just Bikes.

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    …and that means you need to use trucks 3x the size of a normal car, with double the noise output, half the efficiency and four blindspots the size of a child?

    • mozingo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They’re agreeing with y’all tho?

      “Yay logic!” means they think it’s dumb logic.

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It would be weird for their point to be ironic, because the sentence isn’t actually wrong - the US is not designed around walkable neighborhoods.

        • mozingo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That’s exactly their point though? The people who argue for cars argue that they’re necessary because US cities aren’t walkable, while conveniently ignoring that that’s entirely due to the auto industry and that making cities more walkable is still an option. They’re pointing out how fucked that logic is.

          If that’s not what they’re saying, then they’re a terrible communicator as well as an idiot.

          • kadu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You’ve taken the “yay logic!” after their period as to mean “all of what I’ve just wrote is a criticism of the lack of logic inherent to this point”.

            I’ve simply taken it as a reply to OP: “this explanation I’ve just given is how things work, yay logic! (as opposed to your post, OP)”

            Which interpretation is correct? Only they know. Either way, not worth diving deeper into this chain.

            EDIT: Just look at the guy’s comment history. My interpretation is correct, he truly believes what he just wrote, he was arguing for it - not against it.