Google has started automatically blocking emails sent by bulk senders who don’t meet stricter spam thresholds and authenticate their messages as required by new guidelines to strengthen defenses against spam and phishing attacks.

As announced in October, the company now requires those who want to dispatch over 5,000 messages daily to Gmail accounts to set up SPF/DKIM and DMARC email authentication for their domains.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I.e. it’s now even harder to run your own mail server. If it was crypto-related the argument would be Think.if the children™, since it’s email the excuse is spam.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m sure they won’t do this because it’s too community friendly but they should just require all emails be digitally signed. If you don’t sign it goes to spam and if you do sign, and abuse the system, it’ll be much easier to find out who you are.

    • Thomas Douwes@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I know a there are a lot of issues with self-hosting email, but I just don’t thing this is one of them. First, it probably won’t affect a self-hosted servers anyway unless you send a lot of emails, this requirement is only for servers sending 5,000 messages daily to Gmail. And even if you are, the requirements are not that harsh, it’s a couple DNS records and a DKIM signing daemon, and if you are using a pre-build email package like mailcow it’s probably already doing it.

    • shininghero@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Having managed an exchange instance for my old job, I can safely say that DKIM and DMARC are just some extra DNS entries for out-of-band verification. They can be boiled down to a pair of checkboxes on a compliance sheet.
      I can also say that most of the companies we got emails from didn’t have DKIM, and even fewer had DMARC. Or worse, they had DMARC set to p=ignore. Which is honestly even more infuriating.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Without SPF and DKIM, I could send messages pretending to be from you to anybody. Average user has no way to know that the “From:” field does not really mean what it says.