• loopgru@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    This.

    For those not in the industry, the drivers for this are green tags and production tax credits (more common in wind).

    Green tags are basically attaboys for funding the generation of renewable electricity, and are tradable.

    Production tax credits are a $/MWH tax incentive for generating renewable power, and are, again, tradable.

    In both cases, then, there are incentives for renewable projects to keep producing power even when the wholesale power price at the point of interconnection is negative, as there are generation incentives that still make it better than idling.

    From an environmentalist perspective, this is fantastic, as virtually all of this renewable generation represents offset coal and gas peaker plant generation.

    • Iceblade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      From an environmentalist perspective, this is fantastic, as virtually all of this renewable generation represents offset coal and gas peaker plant generation.

      Aren’t prices swinging rapidly between negatives and high peaks a sign of volatility, where specifically fossil gas peaker plants flourish? (Since we have a notable absence of proper grid-level storage)

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        For now, BESS is a hugely growing industry and many countries’ planning authorities are speed lining them.

      • loopgru@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, but if baseline generation goes up there are fewer peak demand events that exceed available baseline capacity so fewer revenue generating opportunities for peaker plants. But I agree the real answer is less overbuild and more storage- unfortunate given today’s Tesla news.