Great news. Hopefully that means if Israel does it anyway they will pay a price too heavy to bear, and we can put the whole “escalate to cover our Gaza situation” thing to bed.
If you cheer on Iran’s strikes on Israel, remember that in addition to Jewish Israelis, Arabs, Palestinians, Muslims & Christians could lose their lives in the attack. Iranian projectiles endanger Ramallah, Bethlehem, Nablus, Amman, Lebanon, Syria & Iraq. War’s not an online game
You see. I remark that missiles have landed in a lot of places putting a lot of different people in jeopardy. The response is “Isreal does too”. Then i inform that Israel doesn’t fly missiles. Comprende
I read your comments several times. I don’t want you to explain it again. I want you to explain it better.
For example you say “Israel doesn’t use many air to ground missiles. They fly airplanes.” By definition air to ground missiles are launched from airplanes. Since this statement makes no sense, what did you mean to say?
I don’t see Iran going so hard that’s on the table. The last strike was beautifully calibrated to re-establish deterrence while doing little politically useful damage, for example.
The real goal here for Israel is to bolster Netanyahu’s hold on power. Iran would just have to hit back hard enough it makes his situation worse, not better, and they could safely do that without the US umbrella. Of course, it all depends on what “won’t support” means. Time for me to read the article.
Great news. Hopefully that means if Israel does it anyway they will pay a price too heavy to bear, and we can put the whole “escalate to cover our Gaza situation” thing to bed.
If you cheer on Iran’s strikes on Israel, remember that in addition to Jewish Israelis, Arabs, Palestinians, Muslims & Christians could lose their lives in the attack. Iranian projectiles endanger Ramallah, Bethlehem, Nablus, Amman, Lebanon, Syria & Iraq. War’s not an online game
Why would I care about them more?
As do Israeli ones. And of course these are all rounding errors compared to what else is happening in Gaza, which is what we’re being distracted from.
I find it truly amusing when the Ceasefire Now crowd celebrates future attacks.
Isreal doesn’t fly many air to ground missles. They use airplanes.
Im really curious as to what you think comes out of those airplanes. Maybe flowers? Love letters?
You see. I remark that missiles have landed in a lot of places putting a lot of different people in jeopardy. The response is “Isreal does too”. Then i inform that Israel doesn’t fly missiles. Comprende
I don’t comprehend. Can you explain?
Read each from the top and when you get here I’ll explain it again
I read your comments several times. I don’t want you to explain it again. I want you to explain it better.
For example you say “Israel doesn’t use many air to ground missiles. They fly airplanes.” By definition air to ground missiles are launched from airplanes. Since this statement makes no sense, what did you mean to say?
I was not celebrating future warfare. I was hoping it wouldn’t go that far, and you or anyone else can read it.
That wasn’t you huh.
Even if we’re lying by omission of context,
What does that even mean?
Provided Israel doesn’t say fuck it, we’re going nuclear.
I don’t see Iran going so hard that’s on the table. The last strike was beautifully calibrated to re-establish deterrence while doing little politically useful damage, for example.
The real goal here for Israel is to bolster Netanyahu’s hold on power. Iran would just have to hit back hard enough it makes his situation worse, not better, and they could safely do that without the US umbrella. Of course, it all depends on what “won’t support” means. Time for me to read the article.
Edit: Still not clear.