• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The headline was confusing and reading the article doesn’t really clear things up. I don’t think Gill is imagining the same sort of “pretend person” that I would want out of AGI. What I want is a personal assistant that knows me extremely well, is able to tirelessly work on my behalf, and has a personality tailored to my needs and interests. It should be general enough to understand me on a personal level and do a good job anticipating what I want.

    That would not at all be a waste of energy to me.

    • KRAW@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Depends on how much energy it takes. If it takes more resources than it frees, then I’d say it is not worth it.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      knows me extremely well, is able to tirelessly work on my behalf, and has a personality tailored to my needs and interests.

      Those may still be ANI applications.

      Today’s LLM’s marketed as the future of AGI are more focused on knowing a little bit about everything. Including a little bit about how MRIs work and a summary of memes floating around a parody subreddit. I fail to see how LLM’s as they are trained today will know you extremely well and give you a personality tailored to your needs. I also think commercial interests of big tech are pitted against your desire for “tirelessly work[ing] on my behalf”.