• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hmm. It’s not totally clear to me from the description what’s breaking, but based on what’s there, I feel like this maybe isn’t the best fix. Like, okay, fine, maybe the lube problem is the proximate cause.

    But bigger question: should automobile pedals mechanically be able to be wedged down by the pedal in the first place? Like, can I shove the pedal down with one foot and then pull this pedal cover up with another in such a way that it gets held in the down position?

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    From the comments:

    When I worked at Boeing, we used dawn dish soap to seat door gaskets. Tesla is just adopting aerospace technologies for its fancy cars, what’s the problem?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    On Monday, we learned that Tesla had suspended customer deliveries of its stainless steel-clad electric pickup truck.

    Now, the automaker has issued a recall for all the Cybertrucks in customer hands—nearly 4,000 of them—in order to fix a problem with the accelerator pedal.

    It has come at an inconvenient time for Tesla, which is laying off more than 10 percent of its workforce due to shrinking sales even as CEO Elon Musk asks for an extra $55.8 billion in compensation.

    Fortunately, applying the brake overrides the accelerator and cuts torque immediately, but that still didn’t prevent one owner from allegedly crashing into a light pole before he was able to bring his Cybertruck to a stop.

    Tesla is no stranger to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s official recall process, but this time there is no software fix or over-the-air patch.

    The company says that it will notify its stores and service centers about the recall “on or around” today, and that owners will be contacted in due course.


    The original article contains 317 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 47%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Vanth@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Crap summarization this time, it cut out the entire technical problem description:

      The problem, which affects all 3,878 Cybertrucks delivered so far, has to do with the EV’s accelerator pedal. Tesla has fitted this with a metal-finish cover to match the brushed metal appearance of the truck itself—no word on whether the pedals rust, too—but it says that at some point, “an unapproved change introduced lubricant (soap) to aid in the component assembly of the pad onto the accelerator pedal. Residual lubricant reduced the retention of the pad to the pedal.”

      Thanks to the profile of the Cybertruck’s under dash, if the pedal cover becomes partially detached it can slide up and become trapped in place, wedging the pedal down and unleashing all of the Cybertruck’s substantial power—the dual-motor truck boasts 600 hp (447 kW) and can reach 60 mph (98 km/h) in just over four seconds.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe these summarizations have always been bad, but every time I read one (which has only been in the past couple of months…maybe I’m just getting lazy) they’re terrible. Borderline nonsensical.

        • Vanth@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sometimes I appreciate them when it’s summarizing something behind a paywall or on a site I don’t want to give my clicks to. I generally don’t compare the bot summary to the original, but the total lack of problem description here caught my eye. Turns out in this case, the “47% words saved” means the bot deleted two paragraphs. Color me unimpressed, I don’t need AI/LLM to do that.