A sex offender convicted of making more than 1,000 indecent images of children has been banned from using any “AI creating tools” for the next five years in the first known case of its kind.

Anthony Dover, 48, was ordered by a UK court “not to use, visit or access” artificial intelligence generation tools without the prior permission of police as a condition of a sexual harm prevention order imposed in February.

The ban prohibits him from using tools such as text-to-image generators, which can make lifelike pictures based on a written command, and “nudifying” websites used to make explicit “deepfakes”.

Dover, who was given a community order and £200 fine, has also been explicitly ordered not to use Stable Diffusion software, which has reportedly been exploited by paedophiles to create hyper-realistic child sexual abuse material, according to records from a sentencing hearing at Poole magistrates court.

  • Observer1199@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    By banning AI imagery production using safe models, legislators leave no legal way for pedophiles to get something by the harmless means.

    Paedophile’s are not entitled to, nor should they get “something” or anything when it comes to any desire to engage in sexual abuse of a child.

    directing many to the harmful ways as equally illegal

    No, that is not the cause nor does it provide any justification.

    while also prosecuting those who did no harm.

    Consumers of CSAM in ANY form are doing the worst harm. There is no excuse that can be provided to justify this. Take a long look at your life. Children are not sexual objects, AI generated or not.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s not a matter of entitlement but of a real world harm. And generated imagery involving imaginary children does not constitude child sexual abuse.

      I’d gladly give pedophiles generated imagery if that were to stop them from lurking in search of real CSAM, supporting the industry that creates a very tangible harm - actual child abuse.

      And my life has nothing to do with either, so don’t make it personal. I only share my opinion on what we should really do to protect children, not to protect our deeply rooted views.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure they’re entitled to something.

      Coping mechanisms to help them not pursue that desire, or a first class ticket on a rocket to the sun.

      There is no middle ground.