• Rabbit R1 AI box is actually an Android app in a limited $200 box, running on AOSP without Google Play.
  • Rabbit Inc. is unhappy about details of its tech stack being public, threatening action against unauthorized emulators.
  • AOSP is a logical choice for mobile hardware as it provides essential functionalities without the need for Google Play.
  • TomMasz@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    So it’s just a single app running on a minimal Android implementation, the AI is done on remote servers and it still gets lousy battery life? Sounds like they dropped the ball on design. Nevertheless, no one is going to carry this that doesn’t already have a phone that can do everything the Rabbit does. It has no reason to exist.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yes, they have came out since this discovery saying that there is no ‘app’ and that the AI computed requests in the cloud.

      These people basically found the connection to the cloud.

      But yeah, stupid product that does practically nothing [that a phone cant].

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s so weird how they’re just insisting it isn’t an android app even though people have proven it is. Who do they expect to believe them?

      • Veraxus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You know, pairing an LLM with Playright is actually a pretty great idea. But that’s something I can totally roll on my own.

    • sickhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s the Juicero strategy.

      “You can’t squeeze our juice packs! Only our special machine can properly squeeze our juice packs for optimal taste!”

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Their target audience are the most gullible tech evangelists in the world that think AI is magic. If there was a limit to the lies those people are willing to believe, they wouldn’t be buying the thing to begin with.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This will flop though. So will the stupid Humane pin.

        Either there are very few people that gullible or that group isn’t quite as gullible as you think.

    • Anamana@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They have thought of a specific design for the device using its own interaction modality and created a product that is more than just software.

      Therefore don’t get why people refer to it being just an app? Does it make it worth less, because it runs on Android? Many devices, e.g. e-readers are just Android Apps as well. If it works it works.

      In this case it doesn’t, so why not focus on that?

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, they’re not.

        An ereader is a piece of hardware that has a distinct purpose that cannot be matched by other hardware (high quality, high contrast, low power draw static content). Some of them do run Android, and that’s a huge value add. But the actual hardware is the reason it exists.

        This is just a dogshit Android phone. There is no unique hardware niche it’s filling. It’s an extremely obvious scam that is very obviously massively downgraded in all of value, utility, and performance by being forced onto separate hardware.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why even try to sell me another device though?

        Anything and everything this square does, my phone can do better already and has the added benefit of already being in my pocket and not a pain in the ass to use.

        • Anamana@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Because, you know, technological development? Someone has to fund R&D, because it’s not cheap. And in 10 years everyone will have similar ai-enhanced devices. No one thought smartphones will make it back in the days as well. And I’m already looking forward to the time when I don’t have to look down anymore to get information

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            And in 10 years everyone will have similar ai-enhanced devices.

            In 10 years (or actually 0 years because it’s already kinda true) people will have an AI enhanced device… And it’ll be their phone.

            Also, you’re arguing something I’m going to name the inevitability fallacy (for my own amusement). It’s not inevitable that everyone will have one of these particular type of devices in the same way it wasn’t inevitable that everyone would start watching 3d TV in their houses.

            This is just another in a long line of things that supply side economics driven companies are trying to sell us. There’s next to no need or demand for this thing, and there’s no guarantee that there will be.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    lol at calling running Android an “emulator”.

    Also don’t they have to distribute the actual code for the OS if it’s lightly altered Android?

    • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      AOSP is fully Apache-2.0 licensed except for the Linux kernel, so only their kernel changes would have to be. It’s also an important reason why Android was/is so successful.

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Ubuntu is just a bunch of apps running on Debian! Did you know you can take Ubuntu app .deb files and run them on Debian?

    Look. The R1 is stupid, but this isn’t the reason why.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      What? .deb aren’t app files they are debian packages

      What are you talking about? The article didn’t mention Ubuntu once

    • SereneHurricane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The difference here is Ubuntu is open about the fact that stand on the shoulders of something greater than them.

      R1 in contrast pretend that everything they’ve built is proprietary, and therefore no one could possibly come up with something similar.

      When it’s clearly not the case.

      This is critical, not for the purpose of sales, but for the purpose of retaining investor value.

      The whole thing reeks of an exercise to generate artificial investor value.

      If investors find out that their so-called innovation can actually be done by anyone with some coding skills and connectivity to open AI, then the company value will drop like a hot turd.

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    •Rabbit Inc. is unhappy about details of its tech stack being public, threatening action against unauthorized emulators.

    All android devices are “emulators” like their hardware isn’t special

  • 0x2d@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    their page to link accounts to it was not a real webapp, it was a novnc page that would connect to an ubuntu vm that runs chrome with no sandboxing and basic password store under fluxbox wm

    someone dumped the home directory from it

      • SereneHurricane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It basically implies that they cobbled together some standard technology but they didn’t even put it together very well.

        It’s like a solution that’s held in place with chewing gum and Band-Aids.

    • cheet@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Holy shit, that’s actually hilarious, I imagine someone would have noticed when their paste/auto type password managers didn’t work

      For those confused, this sounds like instead of making a real website, they spin up a vm, embed a remote desktop tool into their website and have you login through chrome running on their VM, this is sooooo sketch it, its unreal anyone would use this in a public product.

      Imagine if to sign into facebook from an app, you had to go to someone else’s computer, login and save your credentials on their PC, would that be a good idea?

      • brotkel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        What I don’t understand is why. This sounds like way more work than spinning up some out-of-the-box framework with oAuth or a Google login and hosting it on Lambda or Azure. What is logging in on a VM box even going to do for the device?

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    lmao threatening action against their own imminent irrelevance, more like

    Not cool guys, not cool at all

    And get serious - fuck your “proprietary” details, fuck lying/misrepresentation for money, and fuck you for trying a stunt like this.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The AI boom in a nutshell. Repackaged software and content with a shiny AI coat of paint. Even the AI itself is often just repackaged chatgpt.

    • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      What’s interesting about this device is that it (supposedly) learns how apps work and how people use them, so if you ask it something that requires using an app it could do it.

      So while it might be “just an android app”, if it does what’s advertised that would be impressive.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Apps are designed to be easy to use. If this device works as advertised (and that’s a huge if), then it wouldn’t offer much in the way of convenience anyway. From what I’ve been reading, it doesn’t work well at all.

    • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Repackaging ChatGPT is arguably a very nice potential value add, because going to a website is not always very convenient. But it needs to be done right to convince users to use a new method to access ChatGPT instead of just using their website.

    • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      perplexity for this device. still, excited to get my pre-order if only to add to my teenage engineering collection

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Unless you have tons of money, why preorder? Just wait for the company to inevitably go under and people start reselling their now-useless devices, and then scoop as many as you want from Ebay. Even if the company survives for a while, the functionality is so underwhelming they might start getting rid of them way sooner.

        • voxel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          must be a cool device to jailbreak and mess around with just for the sake of it tho
          it has a very unique form factor after all

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The processing was done server-side as it is with the other thing. If you find a way to do it client-side let me know otherwise I’m not interested in your dumb product.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Spoiler: when they let you know about the better device, your phone will already be much better at the same client-side processing anyway.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes, but it’s also unauthenticated (it doesn’t verify it comes from the real device, or even run an account belonging to a device owner)

      You just need the app

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      What, you aren’t excited about a future where everything is cloud computing spyware that sends all your activity to an AI to be analyzed and picked apart by strangers?