• Rabbit R1 AI box is actually an Android app in a limited $200 box, running on AOSP without Google Play.
  • Rabbit Inc. is unhappy about details of its tech stack being public, threatening action against unauthorized emulators.
  • AOSP is a logical choice for mobile hardware as it provides essential functionalities without the need for Google Play.
  • Zoots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    An app that would require root access to fully operate. It is designed to run and use apps automatically. Large Action Mode, I think. Easiest way to get this out is a standalone device

    • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I may not fully understand the situation, but AOSP offers an API called Accessability that allows an app to hook and modify how the user interacts with the UI. the best example is probably Talkback.

  • finkrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is why I cringe at cell phone manufacturers selling cloud and AI features based on phone models because wtf you’re not running that cloud on that handset so why do you gatekeep the product behind that model? It can’t require that many resources, it’s a cloud app!

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The AI boom in a nutshell. Repackaged software and content with a shiny AI coat of paint. Even the AI itself is often just repackaged chatgpt.

    • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What’s interesting about this device is that it (supposedly) learns how apps work and how people use them, so if you ask it something that requires using an app it could do it.

      So while it might be “just an android app”, if it does what’s advertised that would be impressive.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Apps are designed to be easy to use. If this device works as advertised (and that’s a huge if), then it wouldn’t offer much in the way of convenience anyway. From what I’ve been reading, it doesn’t work well at all.

    • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Repackaging ChatGPT is arguably a very nice potential value add, because going to a website is not always very convenient. But it needs to be done right to convince users to use a new method to access ChatGPT instead of just using their website.

    • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      perplexity for this device. still, excited to get my pre-order if only to add to my teenage engineering collection

        • voxel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          must be a cool device to jailbreak and mess around with just for the sake of it tho
          it has a very unique form factor after all

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Unless you have tons of money, why preorder? Just wait for the company to inevitably go under and people start reselling their now-useless devices, and then scoop as many as you want from Ebay. Even if the company survives for a while, the functionality is so underwhelming they might start getting rid of them way sooner.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    lol at calling running Android an “emulator”.

    Also don’t they have to distribute the actual code for the OS if it’s lightly altered Android?

    • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      AOSP is fully Apache-2.0 licensed except for the Linux kernel, so only their kernel changes would have to be. It’s also an important reason why Android was/is so successful.

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    •Rabbit Inc. is unhappy about details of its tech stack being public, threatening action against unauthorized emulators.

    All android devices are “emulators” like their hardware isn’t special

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ubuntu is just a bunch of apps running on Debian! Did you know you can take Ubuntu app .deb files and run them on Debian?

    Look. The R1 is stupid, but this isn’t the reason why.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What? .deb aren’t app files they are debian packages

      What are you talking about? The article didn’t mention Ubuntu once

    • SereneHurricane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The difference here is Ubuntu is open about the fact that stand on the shoulders of something greater than them.

      R1 in contrast pretend that everything they’ve built is proprietary, and therefore no one could possibly come up with something similar.

      When it’s clearly not the case.

      This is critical, not for the purpose of sales, but for the purpose of retaining investor value.

      The whole thing reeks of an exercise to generate artificial investor value.

      If investors find out that their so-called innovation can actually be done by anyone with some coding skills and connectivity to open AI, then the company value will drop like a hot turd.

  • TomMasz@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So it’s just a single app running on a minimal Android implementation, the AI is done on remote servers and it still gets lousy battery life? Sounds like they dropped the ball on design. Nevertheless, no one is going to carry this that doesn’t already have a phone that can do everything the Rabbit does. It has no reason to exist.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes, they have came out since this discovery saying that there is no ‘app’ and that the AI computed requests in the cloud.

      These people basically found the connection to the cloud.

      But yeah, stupid product that does practically nothing [that a phone cant].

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s so weird how they’re just insisting it isn’t an android app even though people have proven it is. Who do they expect to believe them?

      • Veraxus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You know, pairing an LLM with Playright is actually a pretty great idea. But that’s something I can totally roll on my own.

    • sickhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s the Juicero strategy.

      “You can’t squeeze our juice packs! Only our special machine can properly squeeze our juice packs for optimal taste!”

    • Anamana@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They have thought of a specific design for the device using its own interaction modality and created a product that is more than just software.

      Therefore don’t get why people refer to it being just an app? Does it make it worth less, because it runs on Android? Many devices, e.g. e-readers are just Android Apps as well. If it works it works.

      In this case it doesn’t, so why not focus on that?

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why even try to sell me another device though?

        Anything and everything this square does, my phone can do better already and has the added benefit of already being in my pocket and not a pain in the ass to use.

        • Anamana@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Because, you know, technological development? Someone has to fund R&D, because it’s not cheap. And in 10 years everyone will have similar ai-enhanced devices. No one thought smartphones will make it back in the days as well. And I’m already looking forward to the time when I don’t have to look down anymore to get information

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            And in 10 years everyone will have similar ai-enhanced devices.

            In 10 years (or actually 0 years because it’s already kinda true) people will have an AI enhanced device… And it’ll be their phone.

            Also, you’re arguing something I’m going to name the inevitability fallacy (for my own amusement). It’s not inevitable that everyone will have one of these particular type of devices in the same way it wasn’t inevitable that everyone would start watching 3d TV in their houses.

            This is just another in a long line of things that supply side economics driven companies are trying to sell us. There’s next to no need or demand for this thing, and there’s no guarantee that there will be.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, they’re not.

        An ereader is a piece of hardware that has a distinct purpose that cannot be matched by other hardware (high quality, high contrast, low power draw static content). Some of them do run Android, and that’s a huge value add. But the actual hardware is the reason it exists.

        This is just a dogshit Android phone. There is no unique hardware niche it’s filling. It’s an extremely obvious scam that is very obviously massively downgraded in all of value, utility, and performance by being forced onto separate hardware.

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Their target audience are the most gullible tech evangelists in the world that think AI is magic. If there was a limit to the lies those people are willing to believe, they wouldn’t be buying the thing to begin with.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This will flop though. So will the stupid Humane pin.

        Either there are very few people that gullible or that group isn’t quite as gullible as you think.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn’t Lemmy supposed to be tech savvy? What do people think the vast majority of Linux OSs are? They’re derivatives of a base distribution. Often they’re even derivatives of a derivative.

      Did people think a startup was going to build an entire OS from scratch? What would even be the benefit of that? Deriving Android is the right choice here. This R1 is dumb, but this is not why.

    • anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same. As soon as I saw the list of apps they support, it was clear to me that they’re running Android. That’s the only way to provide that feature.

    • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Magic

      In all reality, it is a ChatGPTitty "fine"tune on some datasets they hobbled together for VQA and Android app UI driving. They did the initial test finetune, then apparently the CEO or whatever was drooling over it and said “lEt’S mAkE aN iOt DeViCe GuYs!!1!” after their paltry attempt to racketeer an NFT metaverse game.

      Neither this nor Humane do any AI computation on device. It would be a stretch to say there’s even a possibility that the speech recognition could be client-side, as they are always-connected devices that are even more useless without Internet than they already are with.

      Make no mistake: these money-hungry fucks are only selling you food cans labelled as magic beans. You have been warned and if you expect anything less from them then you only have your own dumbass to blame for trusting Silicon Valley.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If the Humane could recognise speech on-device, and didn’t require its own data plan, I’d be reasonably interested, since I don’t really like using my phone for structuring my day.

        I’d like a wearable that I can brain dump to, quickly check things without needing to unlock my phone, and keep on top of schedule. Sadly for me it looks like I’ll need to go the DIY route with an esp32 board and an e-ink display, and drop any kind of stt + tts plans

        • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sadly for me it looks like I’ll need to go the DIY route with an esp32 board and an e-ink display, and drop any kind of stt + tts plans

          Latte Panda 2 or just wait a couple years. It’ll happen eventually because it’s so obvious it’s literally unpatentable.