This is the best summary I could come up with:
Precisely because the Parliament is relatively weak, the election is closely watched as a measure of uninhibited popular sentiment, where voters register their discontent with potentially powerful downstream effects on national politics.
For France, it means that a party that is nationalist, xenophobic and Islamophobic may well emerge reinforced — accepted, legitimized and eminently electable to high office in a way that would have been unthinkable even a decade ago.
The language of these parties may be less incandescent than former President Donald J. Trump’s invocations of “bloodshed,” but as they whip up support by scapegoating immigrants, and even move to lock in systems that could perpetuate their power, the threat to the postwar order seems real enough.
Warnings of the disasters that engulfed 20th-century Europe under fascist governments tend not to resonate with 21st-century supporters of xenophobic nationalist movements that have none of the militarism of fascism, nor the personality cults of its dictatorial leaders, but are fed by hatred of “the other” and jingoistic hymns to national glory.
The working class, long the cornerstone of socialism in Europe, migrated en masse to the anti-immigrant right as an expression of frustration at growing inequality and stagnant paychecks.
For them, as for Mr. Putin, it has been easy to present a simplistic portrayal of the West of liberal urban elites as the decadent locus of cultural suicide, the place where family, church, nation and traditional notions of marriage and gender go to die.
The original article contains 2,099 words, the summary contains 243 words. Saved 88%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
The article is behind a paywall so I can’t read it, but the answer to the question is that they are about as dangerous as all other parties. Yes, we should watch out for “far-right” parties eroding democracy and civil liberties. We should also watch out for center-right, center-left and far-left and literally all other parties doing the same. Authoritarian tendencies are bad no matter what ideology is the current excuse.
So we should not pay more attention to parties with a ton of authoritarian tendencies compared to a party that has one or two viewpoints that may be construed as authoritarian?
I will posit my question in the nicest way I can think off. Are you fucking retarded?!?
I don’t entirely agree with you because what you are saying is basically stop here. Here sucks. Hard. The window shifted. We need to shift left a bit imo. That includes taxing rich more and spending it in house not abroad. Military doesn’t count. They don’t need the extra money. And yes, authoritarian tendencies are bad. They are just made worst by a strong loyal military. How long before they remove the clause about not following orders that are illegal?
Is that you, Neville Chamberlain?
How many “far-right” parties are about waging wars of aggression and conquest nowadays?
Maybe not conquest but 100% of far right parties are advocating violence, usually including military aggression, towards “the others”, whether it’s Palestinians, Iran, Muslims in general, Jews and Christians in the case of Muslim far right parties, LGBTQ+ people, or more than one of the above.
Yeah you’re right, as long as they only victimise and kill their own people it’s JUST FINE.
God, the shit people write sometimes…
You mean other than the ones sucking up to Putin while he wages a war of aggression and conquest in Ukraine while threatening other European countries?
It’s like we learned nothing from the 20th century: every time the rich get too greedy, they’ll gleefully fertilize the fields of fascism before they’ll accept making less money.
When do we eat the rich? Asking for a friend…
Roughly 8 hours at 250F
The best time to plant a tree was 30 years ago, the second best time is now.
The rich wrote the history books and have a strong influence in education, so… yeah.
Don’t forget about the Red Scare either. We’re still feeling the effects today (mostly in the US, which matters everywhere else as well due to the economic influence of the US in the world)
Its interesting how after the far left has a period leading the global narrative how u get a far right responds popping up. Almost like both sides are wrong but too stuck up their own asses to realise it.
Removed by mod
This comment was brought to you by “everything to the left of hunting the homeless for sport is far-left”.
Sounds like fun NGL probably would solve a lot of problems add a multiplier bonus based on the number of substances in the bloodstream. Ohh and probably should make it so every elected official for the area has to spend the same percentage of time homeless as the area they govern has homeless. Death is one hell of a motivator.
Which country was governed by the far left? Maybe some socialists had a bit of power in Europe but that’s about as left as it goes
Did I say power or narrative?