When Bloomberg reported that Spotify would be upping the cost of its premium subscription from $9.99 to $10.99, and including 15 hours of audiobooks per month in the U.S., the change sounded like a win for songwriters and publishers. Higher subscription prices typically equate to a bump in U.S. mechanical royalties — but not this time.

By adding audiobooks into Spotify’s premium tier, the streaming service now claims it qualifies to pay a discounted “bundle” rate to songwriters for premium streams, given Spotify now has to pay licensing for both books and music from the same price tag — which will only be a dollar higher than when music was the only premium offering. Additionally, Spotify will reclassify its duo and family subscription plans as bundles as well.

  • Aux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    What happened to curating your music library?

    Nothing. Because that was never really a thing. What you’re describing was/is just a hobby. And, like most hobbies, it’s small and niche relative to the industry as a whole. Most people were listening to music for free through radio since forever. Then TV was added into the mix. Paying for music, unless it’s a concert, is just not really a concept humanity is familiar with.

    • jae@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree that many people listened to music for free via radio but I’m skeptical that it was just a hobby? What about the Zune/iPod days? People went through more efforts to curate a library, no? Whether it was with music downloaded illegally, or actually paid for via iTunes…

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It was rarely curated. You just listen to the radio, hear some cool tunes, buy the albums of the artists, the end.

        • jae@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          That’s what I meant by curated! Taking the effort to buy some cool songs/albums you liked. Is there a connotation to “curation” that I don’t know about?

          • shikitohno@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think curation implies more depth and selectivity to the collection and perhaps a certain amount of active effort to obtain and maintain it. You’re talking about hearing a song you like on the radio and clicking “buy,” where the sort of person who would talk about their curated library would spend their weekends digging through crates looking for the final LP released on some random record label in 1985 they need to complete their collection of what is, to them, the pinnacle of early house music as released in Yugoslavia prior to the fall of the USSR. Even if it’s not as hyper-specific as that example, I would expect them to at least have things meticulously tagged and organized.

            • jae@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s fair. But then what is the word for what I am talking of? Just simply “collecting”? But could that also have a connotation of a person who’s into collecting music as a hobby, like what you’re saying for “curated”?