• rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I feel like trying to make the big fish act in our interest and not theirs is fighting windmills.

    Better kill the big fish.

    Not directly on topic - note how all the socialist revolutionaries always start with killing the smallest fish and hate it the most. The big ones they try to convert.

    • mark@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Genuine question: how do we actually “kill the big fish” though? Majority are going to continue to use big tech out of convenience and because they dont care much.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        No quick way. There are too many regulations which are enforced badly and abused to actually support that “big fish”. Make them fewer and make the punishment swift and unavoidable and hard. And split a few of the worst offenders into parts each in one specific area - Apple, Google, Microsoft, Meta are all good candidates.

      • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think in the end it all comes down to putting power back into the hands of regulators — power that corporate America has been slowly and steadily eroding for the last 40 years.

        A more powerful regulatory state could start enforcing the anti-trust laws we already have on the books by breaking up the massive tech monopolies. Once that’s done, new regulations and new legislation against anti-consumer practices are needed, but those will only work if the punishments scale high enough to work as an actual deterrent against the multi-billion dollar tech giants.

        Of course, we’d also need massive, MASSIVE campaign finance and lobbying reforms so that monied interested aren’t able to sabotage the system all over again.

        Or we could just bring back the guillotine… that would probably do the trick too.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You forgot to say that regulatory apparatus should have much fewer points of failure. That is, it should be made stronger and more efficient, but it should be radically contracted. It’s bigger than needs be.

          By points of failure I mean opportunities for strong entities to make regulations work for monopolies\oligopolies.