• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Even ignoring all his crazy stances, he’s the CEO of an American EV company! What the fuck what would you expect him to say!?

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Tesla has both a gigafactory and a Supercharger factory in mainland China. Any semi-competent CEO would recognize that publicly advocating for tariffs on China would have a good chance of backfiring. China could easily turn around and slap 100% tariffs on everything coming out of those two factories in retaliation.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the ask is to just pick a lane.

      Nobody had a gun to his head demanding him to espouse his commitment to an unregulated free market. He made these broad statements of his own volition.

      Now, when he’s championing the exact opposite… What?

      For people who believed, rightly or wrongly that he had any value-baded stances, they have to accept that they don’t exist.

      That’s what these doofuses are upset about: that the xth richest person in the world is only out for themselves. There is no deeper truth.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        He has no need for integrity or consistency. Just like every other fascism-aligned clown choosing or inventing whichever rules they like for each situation.

  • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Welp that’s if for me then, I’m against tariffs on the cheap shit chinese ev’s. Anything that piece of shit wants is bad for us.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I understand the sentiment but that logic isn’t a great way to reliably get you closer to truth.

  • BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t mind bashing Musk for a second, but as far as I know China follows a startup mentality with electric cars - the government supports the industry so they can sell cars below their actual price, and once they killed all their competition they can increase.

    There’s no fair winning against this policy

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would think that the winning move would be to impose enough tariffs to offset the foreign government subsidies, yet still promote some competition.

    • localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Like that time a US state subsidised Tesla with a billion dollar factory in exchange for jobs most of which were never delivered. I bet in China at least they would expect their grant deal to be fulfilled.

      I’m not trying to advocate for China, just pointing out how much of Tesla’s current position is the result of hand outs (see; carbon credits)

    • buzz86us@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And the US supports the oil and gas industry. The government supports the industry so they can sell gas below its actual price.

  • surfrock66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Part of the free-market attitude though is that you should be allowed to buy policy, so in that regard it’s consistent, you just have to account for corruption in the cost of doing business.

  • jmanes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is how all capitalist markets progress, which is why I get annoyed when folks try to talk about this as though it is hypocritical. There is nothing hypocritical about a capitalist attempting to stifle innovation and competition for the advancement of their own personal wealth. This is what capitalism is about.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s why you work to make sure that there is competition. I’m pretty sure it shouldn’t come as a shock that a EV manufacturer doesn’t want to have to compete.

    • Rhaedas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I agree that’s it’s a “hate the game, not the player”. The issue is how much influence he could have to steer the market to favor his product vs. the competition. It’s happened so many times in history where the better product fails because they can’t play the game like the inferior company.

      To quote “Pirates of Silicon Valley”:

      Steve Jobs: We’re better than you are! We have better stuff.

      Bill Gates: You don’t get it, Steve. That doesn’t matter!

      So is it fair for the consumer for big companies to be able to influence the game itself and not just play within the same rules? I’d say no.

      • jmanes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t think you’re really addressing my comment, which is just a criticism of how folks write about these “hypocrisies.”

        Of course it’s not fair; that’s the entire foundational pillar on which capitalism rests. I’m not saying “hate the game, not the player”. Rather I’m saying the game is bullshit and the player should have his balls kicked with steel toed boot repeatedly.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ok, what do you suggest? There isn’t any alternatives. You can just ignore the opinion of some billionaire and be done with it.

          • jmanes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            We do not have the option to ignore the opinions of billionaires. Their opinions become government policy through lobbying and it impacts us all.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The “Free Market” is a fantasy originally pushed by Think Tanks funded by the Koch Brothers.

        All the great things we’re told about The Free MarketTM only ever work in highly competitive markets with no barriers to entry were it’s easy for any Jane, Jack or Joe to enter the Market and start competing with the rest: thinks like soap or teddy bears.

        As soon as something as simple as Land-ownership gets involved (for example, for your store in a prime location) it stops being perfectly competitive and all of a sudden you get feedback loops were the more money somebody does the more money somebody is capable of doing, meaning that first mover advantage is close to unassailable (and what we see in the modern world is that the ones with the biggest first mover advantages inherited them).

        The Free MarketTM is really just an ideological excuse from neoliberals to convince people that the power of the vote should be indirectly weakenned (sure, you can vote, but the State, which is controlled by voters’ elected representatives, can’t regulate or otherwise “intervene in the market”, so de facto the vote loses most of its power) so that the Power of Money can do whatever it wants because “the Free Market knows best”. Dig through the technochratic pseudo-Economic mumbo-jumbo and what you find is a ideology to weaken Democracy and replace it by Oligarchy.