Hi!

I often read suggestions to use something like Tailscale to create a tunnel between a home server and a VPS because it is allegedly safer than opening a port for WireGuard (WG) or Nginx on my router and connecting to my home network that way.

However, if my VPS is compromised, wouldn’t the attacker still be able to access my local network? How does using an extra layer (the VPS) make it safer?

  • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I self host because i do not trust companies. I will not even consider giving tailscale the keys to my kingdom.

    The company Tailscale is a giant target and has a much higher risk in getting compromised than my VPN or even accessible services.

    Understand the technology that you use and assess your use case and threat model.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      The company Tailscale is a giant target and has a much higher risk in getting compromised than my VPN or even accessible services.

      One must be careful about this mindset. A bunch of smart lightbulbs that are individually operated aren’t a particularly appealing target either. However, in aggregate… If someone can write a script that abuses security flaws in them or their default configuration … even though you’re not part of a big centralized target, you are part of a class that can be targeted automatically at scale.

      Self hosting only yields better security when you are willing to take steps to adequately secure your self hosted services and implement a disaster recovery strategy.