• Jaderick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      peer reviewed properly

      Is the important bit here. The timeline from that Wikipedia article shows it was published in 2005 and work disproving it’s claim came around in 2006.

      If a scientists work is retracted it really kills any more funding they receive. They use examples like the DRBG one as what not to be.