KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 5 months agoArTiFiCiAl InTeLlIgEnCelemmy.worldimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1758arrow-down16
arrow-up1752arrow-down1imageArTiFiCiAl InTeLlIgEnCelemmy.worldKISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up28·5 months agoThat seems like an inherently false statement. If it was sarcastic, it would be false because it actually is going great. If it’s not sarcastic, than the project is not actually going great.
minus-squareKISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up29arrow-down1·5 months agoIf it’s sarcastic, it actually worked and the inventor might be a genius, but maybe the AI doesn’t like him and wants to make fun of him anyway.
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoAlso, it can be sarcastic only in one of the two statements, so the project is a success but the guy is far from being a genius
minus-squareflerp@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agoThe project could not be going great but also the AI is just incorrect about the status of the project rather than being sarcastic
That seems like an inherently false statement. If it was sarcastic, it would be false because it actually is going great. If it’s not sarcastic, than the project is not actually going great.
If it’s sarcastic, it actually worked and the inventor might be a genius, but maybe the AI doesn’t like him and wants to make fun of him anyway.
Also, it can be sarcastic only in one of the two statements, so the project is a success but the guy is far from being a genius
The project could not be going great but also the AI is just incorrect about the status of the project rather than being sarcastic