• ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Maybe they asked Quora if it was legal.

    In all seriousness, though, I don’t get that site’s popularity. I only ever visit Quora by accident (because Google ranks it highly) and it’s basically always garbage answers. And speaking as a developer, the UI/UX causes my eyes to roll back in my head and say, “REDRUM” in a demonic voice. It’s hard to even tell where the answer is because there’s so much superfluous shit on the page.

  • anguo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Now I have to go try it, so that I can go through this article’s paywall.

      • anguo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t know if I had to do anything special for the prompt, but it just gave me a short summary starting with “Unfortunately I cannot provide the full text of the article you requested, as that would likely infringe on the copyright of the content. However, I can summarize the key points from the article.”

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Quora should be respecting robots.txt, but also why are the NYT etc. serving the full article to the Quora bot anyway?

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Usually NYT sets a cookie to track how many free articles you read and once you exceed that, you get the paywall. The bots probably don’t set/send the cookies, so NYT doesn’t block them. Also, I’d imagine the bots are coming from various different IPs so even server side blocking based on IP wouldn’t block everything and eventually the bot would get to the article. User Agents can also be spoofed.