• Womble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Python can be extremely slow, it doesn’t have to be. I recently re-wrote a stats program at work and got a ~500x speedup over the original python and a 10x speed up over the c++ rewrite of that. If you know how python works and avoid the performance foot-guns like nested loops you can often (though not always) get good performance.

    • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Unless the C++ code was doing something wrong there’s literally no way you can write pure Python that’s 10x faster than it. Something else is going on there. Maybe the c++ code was accidentally O(N^2) or something.

      In general Python will be 10-200 times slower than C++. 50x slower is typical.

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nope, if you’re working on large arrays of data you can get significant speed ups using well optimised BLAS functions that are vectorised (numpy) which beats out simply written c++ operating on each array element in turn. There’s also Numba which uses LLVM to jit compile a subset of python to get compiled performance, though I didnt go to that in this case.

        You could link the BLAS libraries to c++ but its significantly more work than just importing numpy from python.

        • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          numpy

          Numpy is written in C.

          Numba

          Numba is interesting… But a) it can already do multithreading so this change makes little difference, and b) it’s still not going to be as fast as C++ (obviously we don’t count the GPU backend).