Companies are going all-in on artificial intelligence right now, investing millions or even billions into the area while slapping the AI initialism on their products, even when doing so seems strange and pointless.

Heavy investment and increasingly powerful hardware tend to mean more expensive products. To discover if people would be willing to pay extra for hardware with AI capabilities, the question was asked on the TechPowerUp forums.

The results show that over 22,000 people, a massive 84% of the overall vote, said no, they would not pay more. More than 2,200 participants said they didn’t know, while just under 2,000 voters said yes.

  • Kraiden@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    someone tried to sell me a fucking AI fridge the other day. Why the fuck would I want my fridge to “learn my habits?” I don’t even like my phone “learning my habits!”

      • Kraiden@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Now THIS I could get behind! Still not AI though. it’s a very dumb timer system that would be very useful. 1950’s tech could do this!

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        it doesn’t seem all that hard to make, as long as you don’t mind the severely reduced flexibility in capacity and glass bottles shattering against each other at the bottom

    • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      And it would improve your life zero. That is what is absurd about LLM’s in their current iteration, they provide almost no benefit to a vast majority of people.

      All a learning model would do for a fridge is send you advertisements for whatever garbage food is on sale. Could it make recipes based on what you have? Tell it you want to slowly get healthier and have it assist with grocery selection?

      Nah, fuck you and buy stuff.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Exactly, it’s entirely about extra monetization. They all think in terms of hype and money, never in terms of life improvement.

        I’d actually love AI to control something like a home assistant setup by learning how I like things and predicting change (mind you I still need to get it set up at all). But most people don’t even want a smart home.

        Make something that makes the unpleasant parts of life easier and people will be happy with it

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m still pissed about the fact that I can’t buy a reasonably priced TV that doesn’t have WiFi. I should never have left my old LG Plasma bolted to the wall of my previous house when I sold it. That thing had a fantastic picture and doubled as a space heater in the winter.

      • cestvrai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Projector gang checking in 🤓📽️

        Everything alright here?

        You can always join us in the peaceful realm of select input.

        (there are still WiFi-free options)

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I want AI in my fridge for sure. Grocery shopping sucks. Forgetting how old something was sucks. Letting all the cool out to crawl around to see what I have sucks.

      I want my fridge to be like the Sims, just get deliveries or pickup the order. Fill it out and get told what ingredients I have. Bonus points if you can just tell me what recipes I can cook right now, even better if I can ask for time frame.

      That would be sick!

      Still not going to give ecorp all of my data or put some half back internet of stings device on my WiFi for it. But it would be cool.

      • Kraiden@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ye, that’d be sick! and that’s also not what was being sold! this fridge did none of that. What exactly made it “AI” I didn’t bother to find out, but I work in IT. I guarantee it wasn’t this. Also, not convinced I want my fridge to be able to spend my money for me. I want to be able to have a Ramen month if I need/want

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why does a fridge need to know your habits?

      It has to keep the food cold all the time. The light has to come on when you open the door.

      What could it possibly be learning

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        1. Know when you’re about to put groceries in so it makes the fridge colder so the added heat doesn’t make things go bad.
        2. Know when you don’t use it and let it get a tiny bit warmer to save a teeny bit of power. (The vast majority of power is cooling new items, not keeping things cold though.)
        3. Tell you where things are?
        4. Ummm… Maybe give you an optimized layout of how to store things?
        5. Be an attack vector on your home’s wifi
        6. Wait, no, uh,
        7. Push notifications
        8. Do you not have phones?
      • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hi Zron, you seem to really enjoy eating shredded cheese at 2:00am! For your convenience, we’ve placed an order for 50lbs of shredded cheese based on your rate of consumption. Thanks!

          • Kraiden@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think you’re being sarcastic, but I unironically agree. Cars and fridges can, and should stay dumb, with the notable exception of battery management systems in electric vehicles. That’s the single acceptable use case for a car IMHO.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think car play is a wonderful feature. My car should absolutely allow syncing up to my phone. I don’t think it should telemetry or anything like that though. But I think internal process monitoring should also be a thing. Display error codes, show me that a tire is low, monitor a battery, etc. but the manufacturer shouldn’t get that info. My car shouldn’t know my sex life, and the manufacturer definitely shouldn’t

            • Oh I absolutely agree, some things don’t need to be “smart”.

              Imagine if someone put a microchip in a potato peeler claiming that it would add features like “data loging the amount of pressure applied to the potato to ensure clean peels”. The reason why they won’t do that is that the data only benefits the user, and not the company’s profit margins.

        • variants@possumpat.io
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          We also took the liberty of canceling your health insurance to help protect the shareholders from your abhorrent health expenses in the far future

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            If your fridge spies after you, certain people can have better insights into healthiness of your food habits, how organized you are, how often things go bad and are thrown out, what medicine (requiring to be kept cold) do you put there and how often do you use it.

            That will then affect your insurances, your credit rating, and possibly many other ratings other people are interested in.