• aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Git Blame exists for a reason, and that’s to find the engineer who pushed the bad commit so everyone can work together to fix it.

    Blame the Project manager/Middle manager/C-Level exec/Unaware CEO/Greedy Shareholders who allowed for a CI/CD process that doesn’t allow ample time to test and validate changes.

    Software needs a union. This shit is getting out of control.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or it needs to be a profession.

      Licensed professional engineers are expected to push back on requests that endanger the public and face legal liability if they don’t. Software has hit the point where failure is causing the economic damage of a bridge collapsing.

      • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sounds like the kind of oversight that tends to come with a union and the representation therein.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      IT needs unionizing. Unfortunately it pays too well and is filled with retarded libertarians.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Apparently a snowflake deleted my comment too lol

          I’m going to guess it was a libertarian who took exception to my calling them out hahaha

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Snowflake? Why are mentally disabled folks ok to make fun of? They didn’t pick it or do it, and it has nothing to do with good or bad politics.

            Make fun of things people choose to do. Not shit they were born with.

            • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Definition of removed- a person affected with intellectual disability

              I stand by what I said. Sorry I ruffled your jimmies. Not sorry I used the word. You imply my insulting mentally disabled people. I’m not.

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                You are. It’s a slur. It is not an accepted term in the medical community.

                Edit here’s an actual definition from https://www.merriam-webster.com:

                dated, now offensive : affected by intellectual disability : INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED NOTE: The term <r> is increasingly considered offensive. The use of intellectually disabled is now preferred over <r> in medical, educational, and regulatory contexts, as well as in general use.

                Further, you use it as an insult specifically in that you suggest someone of a certain political preference is intellectually disabled.

                Essentially you are combining someone’s medical situation they did not pick or cause, with someone else’s political interests. That’s fucked up.