• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    To this day, key players in security—among them Microsoft and the US National Security Agency—regard Secure Boot as an important, if not essential, foundation of trust in securing devices in some of the most critical environments, including in industrial control and enterprise networks.

    You dare question a monopoly corporation and the spymasters of this country??

    (/s)

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, surely randoms on Lemmy know better than Microsoft and the NSA in regards to security.

      • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Security is the last thing NSA and Micro$oft care about. NSA wants to be sure they can do all they need to with your devices, and M$ just wants to discourage you from switching to linux.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh anyone who doesn’t trust Microsoft with their life is a complete idiot. And the NSA only illegally spied on everyone until Bush the II made it legal! So of course we should unquestioningly follow their configuration guides. I mean - haha - we don’t wanna get disappeared! Haha ha. Not. Not that that’s ever happened. That we know of. For sure. Probably.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          in regards to security

          in regards to security

          in regards to security

          in regards to security

          Just wanted to make sure you saw it this time because you went off on a tangent there.

          • azuth@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It doesn’t matter if they know about security (which they do). A burglar could know about locks and home security systems, would you take his advice?

            Their positions on security of others is dismissed on grounds of trust not of competence.